Hey guys. How are you all. Just dropping by to share this thing I found out about us in Wikipedia, spexifically on the Battleboarding edit history.
Far from the truth. Lol.
5,292
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Killermoves
So yeah, sadly I have been going through some awesome battles and dare I say, some of them needs to be disregarded. The battles include:
Leone Crime Family vs Grove Street Families : The two technically already fought each other when CJ assaulted Salvatore Leon's casino in the mission "Breaking The Back at Caligula's". Another reason for it being disregarded is the fact that Leone was given an M16A2, which does not appear in both GTA III and GTA Liberty City Stories (although the AR-10 and Colt Model 733 did appear, but in fact not M16s).
Tyler Durden vs Joker Nolanverse : I hate myself doing this cause this is such a good battle. But I had to, since Tyler never used an MP5. In fact, MP5s didn't even appear in the movie, and the battle claerly uses the film version.
(Edited by moderator)
Support
Also, Chase. It doesn't mean that a warrior fought in a 19th century rebellion means that he/she used firearms. Take a look at the Juramentadao for example. Those brutes raided and fought the Americans with only their kris and swords in the Philippine-American War.
(Edited by Killermoves)
And I thought Emilio Aguinaldo vs Robert E Lee wa worst. This one is even more god-aweful in terms of fairness. A single shot pistol vs a 6-shot cartridge based revolver? A single shot blunderbuss vs a modern repeating shotgun? yeah right
(Edited by moderator)
Yes and no. There are a lot of modern Filipino words to denote of a home-made gun like lantaka, luthang (archaic) and eskupeta. Paltik in particular, was the type where you can light with a cigarette (other home-made guns have different firing mechanisms). The definition and the picture of the paltik used here is that of the 1940s M5 guerrilla gun "paltik".
However, I do admit that there is one reference which used the word "paltik" to describe homemade guns that were used in Philippine Revolution (My Country and My People, Elizabeth Marquez). But a friend later told me that its an unreliable children's textbook, not an actual history book.
(Edited by Killermoves)
https://deadliestfiction.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Ekreture/Robert_E._Lee_vs._Emilio_Aguinaldo
Even though the great Field Marshal voted for this battle, I'm still going to challenge this on the grounds of VC and FC.
First is that Emilio Aguinaldo would likely never used a "paltik", since those things only existed in WW2. The Filipino Revolutionairres might have used improvised firearms, but defintely not the paltik, which makes the battle anarchronistic.
I also don't see this one being fair for Lee as well. There's like a 30-year gap between the two, which might not sound unfair, but it does if you take into account that Aguinaldo is packing smokeless gunpowder that is more reliable and more powerful than blackpowder weapons. Add also the fact that he has a bolt-action rifle which has bottleneck bullets that can punch through harder and farther than a measly colt rifle, and a break-action revolver against a cap and ball, then forgive me if I don't see this battle as anything than one-sided.
(Edited by moderator)
Support on Reznov and Petrenko vs Price and MacTavish - very unfair to pit WW2 vs Modern Warrior.
Support on all Duke Nukum battles.
Support on all John Rambo battles. I think John used a Scorpion but only in the video game canon. Reznov also used a flamethrower/blowtorch but never an attachment.
Oppose on Vash vs Grifter - Based on the scan info in the battle, it seems that the anime version of Vash was used. And anime Vash used Wolfwood's Punisher in his last battle against Knives.
(Edited by Killermoves)
Holy shit Jacky is actually supporting the expansion of homelessness. Traitor!!!
Anyways, yeah I Support. Kino is an awesome character and deserves a better fight than this.
(Edited by Killermoves)
Yep I'm doing my own cleaning as well guys. Mostly on Filipino battles.
- VC. All the weapons of the Philippine Army is wrong. The battle might be taking place in the Vietnam War, but the PA should be using an M16, not a Galil since I have yet to find a source stating they used it in their history. They also should be using an M1911 or a Rock Island M1911, not a Browning HP. The rest of their weapons also doesn't make any sense. Filipinos have never used an Owens Gun, a US Spec Ops shotgun, Super Bazooka and White Phosphorus (especially this one since we are a poor country who couldn't possible own something like this). The NVA's weapons also doesn't make any sense, like when did they use a LPO Flamethrower?
- Although its sad to see two additional hobos in this wiki, I have to put this one too. The weapons of the Filipinos again, doesn't make any sense. Especially that Grease Gun since, while the AFP did use them back then, it was only used by the mechanized infantry, NOT the Marines. The MArines also has never used the PVAR rifle (and it was never adopted outside of the NAVSOG).
(Edited by moderator)
Tybaltcapulet wrote: Big Supp
I would also suggest you challenge Outlaws vs Yakuza. A fairness challenge or validity challenge would work.Fairness because the Yakuza have a friggin SMG and magazine fed pistol, along with the outlaws having an immobile, almost usless explosive. Validity because why the hell are the outlaws using bullwhips in combat? They're pretty much exclusively used for livestock or in rare cases hunting.
DAMMIT TYB! You gonna make two warriors homeless. But yeah, I'm gonna Support you too on Yakuza vs Outlaws. While I don't think that it's an unfair match as long as the right weapons and timelines are used (I'm sure Wild West outlaws in the 1890s-1900s can take on the Yakuza), I'm more inclined with the validity of the match-up. I have a book that stated that bullwhips were used as a weapons in the Old West, but they were done by feuding and duelling cowpunchers, not outlaws.
(Edited by Killermoves)
It looks like I'm becoming the wiki's regular gangster expert LOL. But anyways yeah, I am going to challenge two Yakuza battles in this wiki.
https://deadliestfiction.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:The_Deadliest_Warrior/Yakuza_vs._Triads
https://deadliestfiction.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Duncan322/Yakuza_vs._Russian_Mafia#long%20range
I just can't see any source that stated that the Yakuza used a Howa Type 64. There might be a chance that they probably used them since the gun's Japanese and they ARE Japanese, but there's no record for it. It also doesn't help that the Yakuza did use assault rifles , but never a Howa.
(Edited by Killermoves)
Support
It's sad that a lot of these are actually pretty good ideas
(Edited by Killermoves)
Support
LMAO I actually pointed this one out last December in the chat and no one believed me!
(Edited by Killermoves)
Oppose
Sorry Cfp. I was initially going to support this, but after reading opinions from others I have to oppose this. I mean, I myself would vote on Wolverine, but Batman is not entirely unarmed with this.
One of Batman's ways to win against Wolverine is stealth. Yes I know that Logan has superhuman senses that not even the ninja Yukio can sneak up on him. But this is Batman we're talking about, a guy who can sneak up on Superman and the Justice League with ease.
But what about Wolverine's adamantium claws? It is true that getting past adamantium is impossible for Bruce Wayne. But he doesn't need to break adamantium, all he has to do is to immobolize Wolverine to win (unless off course its stated that the fight is a battle to the death). Batman has a ton of gadgets such as sticky puttys and powerful magnets that can put a stop to Wolverine.
Does all of this mean that Wolverine will lose? No. I still think he will win with his superhuman speed (the guy can tag speedsters), strength and healing factor. But Batman himself will prove to be a difficult and tricky opponent to beat.
(Edited by Killermoves)