User blog comment:DarthVader1997/Battle of Tyrants: Joseph Stalin vs Adolf Hitler/@comment-8012490-20130512134914

Alright, time for the battle I always wanted.

Main Weapon: While the Makarov is a good weapon, the WalterPPK has been used for a longer time and by more people. They have the same ammo and rounds; however, if the PPK is used more and the Makarov less, then the PPK must have some feature that is better than the Makarov. Such as its stealth may gain Hitler the first shot. Edge: Hitler.

Secondary Weapons: While Stalin has more weapons than Hitler, they are all MBRs. None of them have the versitility or automatic capabilities of Hitlers weapons. In fact, the StG was designed to have the versitility MBRs lack. Edge: Hitler.

Explosives: I honestly don't see much of a difference in the grenades. I'm not sure which one can be thrown farther or has a larger blast, or if it even matters. Edge: Tie.

Melee Weapons: Hitler wins. The woodcuter's axe has more range and killing power than a bayonet does. Even if attached to a rifle, the woodcuter's axe can block the bayonet and twist it around. Something the bayonet cannot do to it. Edge: Hitler.

X-Factors: This may be a difficult one. Stalin's men are, according to this, better organized and slightly more precise and intelligent; however, Stalin is only a warrior because he commands soldiers. Hitler is because of that and because he actually fought in war. Stalin's training of 20 is absolutely abysmal and likely means that he either never even held a gun or only shot once. Even though his men can shoot, I expect Hitler to stand out in the open and Stalin to fire twenty shots and only hit the ground. Hitler is also more stealthy than Stalin is. That, combined with the WalterPPK's concealment, should get Hitler the first shot without Stalin ever managing to hit him (not that he would anyway with a training of 20). Edge: Hitler.

My vote goes to Hitler.