User blog comment:So-Pro Warrior/Team Nolan North vs Team Keith David/@comment-3195617-20120418160220/@comment-143604-20120420234321

Okay- only chiming in to clarify as Arrow asked, because this debate is effectivly over as far as I'm concerned-

The First Call of Duty wasn't bad.

The Second Call of Duty was okay.

The Third was actually a pretty enjoyable game that I enjoyed quite a bit a few years back, though I don't find any real replayability in it. After that, it hits the fan hard.

But seriously- So-Pro deserves a couple votes on this. Why the hell would you comment on the argument and then not vote? That's got to sting, and this battle was clearly worked on quite a bit, so if you took the time to hold this meaningless argument, you could at least take the time to vote, right?