User blog comment:Wassboss/Genghis Khan vs Robin Hood/@comment-5495321-20130626191650

Here goes something...


 * Close range: Normally, I'd choose a stabbing weapon over a slashing weapon. But in this case, the Turko Mongol saber might just get the edge. The Longsword is a two-handed weapon, meaning it takes more effort and space to use it effectively. The saber needs much less space to utilize and can be used off of a horse. But, the Longsword's extra reach makes it a very effective weapon when space is provided, and can easily stab through the Mongolian armor. Overall, each weapon has both advantages, and disadvantages that will give it the edge. EDGE: EVEN


 * Mid range: Easy edge for Khan. The Guan Dao is longer and actually has a blade, unlike the staff. EDGE: GHENGIS KHAN


 * Long range: No doubt both of these bows are legendary and effective in combat. But the Mongolian Recurve is a far more mobile weapon due to its smaller size and how effective it is on horseback. The Longbow needs more room and time to use, despite its longer range. EDGE: GHENGIS KHAN


 * Special: The Rondell is double edged, making it a more effective weapon for killing and going through armor. EDGE: ROBIN HOOD

Overall? I've gotta give this one to 'GHENGIS KHAN. 'Why? He ruled one of the largest empires in all of Asian history and did it effectively. His weapons are more effective and he's a better tactician with more experience. Despite the fact that this is a squad on squad fight, it doesn't deny the fact that Ghengis is the better soldier who even brings better weapons to the fight.