Board Thread:Administrator's Forum/@comment-143604-20130419212451

Hayden has wall-of-text'd another point, as I'm sure you're all aware from browsing the Recent Activity- we currently don't have a clear and definitive set of guidelines for the editing/creation of Expert's Opinions. We remain pretty consistent on most subjects in our pages, so we need to come to a consensus on how Expert's Opinions should be handled in the event that a battle is written without one, as we are often wont to do.
 * Option 1.) If no Expert's Opinion is written for a battle, when a user is updating the Warrior's page in question, they can write an Expert's Opinion for the battle at any time, without permission needed. The Author has rights to override this Opinion if they dislike it, and rewrite it themselves.
 * Option 2.) If no Expert's Opinion is written for a battle, when a user is updating the Warrior's page in question, they can write an Expert's Opinion, but only if permission is granted from the original author, assuming that author is still active for the past few months beforehand. The Author has rights to override this Opinion if they dislike it, and rewrite it themselves.
 * Option 3.) If no Expert's Opinion is written for a battle, the only user who has the right to write one for it is the Original Author, and thus a "No Expert's Opinion will be written." (as per battles) or "TBW" will be left in it's place, depending on the context.

Where do you guys stand on this, and if it's not one of these three options, please offer your own perspective.  