User blog comment:So-Pro Warrior/Lawrence of Arabia vs. Charles W. Whittlesey/@comment-26032472-20160327162311

MilenHD's"This is better than Roosevelt vs Lawrence"edges

Short:Edge Lawrence:Now this was going to be similar to my Lawrence vs Alvin York,except I change to trench knife for Alvin.BTW I have to give this one to Lawrence I highly doubt the Jambiya is not a ceremanial dagger,but a weapon of the nomadic people,capable of deadling greater damage than the bayonet.Also this type of bayonet only stabs and have very little slashing and cutting potential,so easy edge for Lawrence.

Mid:Edge Charles:This is easy edge for Charles.I mean the semi-auto pistols beat the revolvers 99.9% of the time.The pistol is more advaced and easier to reload.Nuff said.

Long:Edge Lawrence:I see M1917 is inspired by the SMLE,but what I always say the original is always better,yeah the M1917 have higher muzzle velocity and much more range,the SMLE bigger round magazine and his reliability will help Lawrence gun to be more effective.Also a quick note:Charles began fighting from 1917,while T.E Lawrence fought from the beginning,so he is more skilled with it.

Special:Edge Charles:While the Vickers is much more powerful,but thats really it,the gun jams alot,it's heavy and lost in almost every other aspect of this category.The M1917 Browning is truly superior in RoF,Muzzle velocity and it's not a jemer.If a gun jams in the middle of fire,than you're dead.

Winner:Lawrence of Arabia,this is not a cake walk for T.E Lawrence,but his superior tactics and leadership and the fact that he dominates in both long and short range will help fight against the better weapons of Charles W. Whittlesey,plus he is more experianced and plus he is has much better endurance than Charles.After hard fought battle T.E Lawrence will win.