User blog comment:Sith Venator/British SAS vs Australian SAS/@comment-5790624-20120423061319

Correction:

1, The British SAS DO NOT USE the L85A2, it is an infantry rifle, not a special forces unit, change it the C8 Carbine, that IS used by them.

2, The L67A1 IS designed for riot control, not engaging other special forces units, they do however attach the UGL Grenade Launcher to their C8 Carbine.

3, They don't use the LSW, it was stopped in usage back a few years ago, they use the FN Minimi or I don't know, the GPM or something.

You need to change these, you've done very well so far, conciderabley better than other people who've picked the SAS against a foe.

This is a VERY close match up and it's hard to find area's to select for my vote, however, the British SAS take this one, they alot less rules on brutality, performance of mission aslong as it suceeds, etc, for example, they did go in through the door of the Irainian Embassy, they blew the bullet proof, armoured windows off.

The SAS have also been involved in several more conflicts, World War 2, Argentina, Bulgaria, The Troubles, Afghanistan, Libya, etc, and also the SASR have also served in several conflicts, the SAS have more including World War 2, this packs battle experience and data in combination with they're far looser training cource, 80% will pass to Special Forces training for the SASR, 99.99% need to not apply for the Royal Marines, a unit below the SAS, showing the SAS are far more exclusive, open to the best and whose whom dare to win.

Edge: SAS