User blog comment:Sith Venator/British SAS vs Australian SAS/@comment-5790624-20120423061319/@comment-5790624-20120425203545

Also, your pitting a claymore against a riot gun? And your x-factors are terribley unfair to the SAS, you say the SASR have more training, the SAS's in ONGOING, the SASR are based the SAS and they're training is far more intence, also, they evidence for the Royal Marines is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUcaM_0ztbM and the statement on the SASR's recuirtment is here, second paragraph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Air_Service_Regiment_(Australia)#Selection_and_training

The SAS have less rules on brutality, aslong as the mission gets done, in they're training is far better, they concentrate on improving the weaknesses of a soldier instead of scrapping them, something exclusive to the SAS, also the SAS created CQB (Close Quarter Battle), a infamous combat system used by many military units. Evidence? 21:05, watch. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGcnS6avc0U