Talk:Russian Mafia/@comment-422690-20130418015900/@comment-4484220-20130418024334

"I do not recall any such consensus myself, either, nor do I remember any consensus about writing expert's opinions for battles without them without the author's permission." I am 95% sure that some time between April and July 2012, we came to the agreement regarding expert's opinions that I stated above. If Drayco comes out and states that he as well does not recall any such agreement, and also shares the same view as you and Arrow that expert's opinions cannot be written by anyone other than the blog post owner, then I promise that I will formally apologize for any incorrect edits I have made in the past, and for causing this unecessary discussion, as well as disrespecting a Bureaucrat and claiming that I am right and he wrong when in fact it's vice versa. Until then, the only thing I'm sorry for is not taking the initiative after this was agreed upon to have this rule written down.

"Your only authority as rollback is to undo vandalism. Enforcing article policy is for admins and bureaus. Clear?" So then why does the first sentence of rollback page say "Rollback members, or rollbacks, are users who enforce the  article policy."? In addition, I asked Pach on chat once, and he told me that I was allowed to deal warnings to users for acts of article vandalism, and allow that to count as official warning points.