User blog comment:Pygmy Hippo 2/Sicarii Assassin vs. Inuit Raider/@comment-34942931-20180902151517

Because doing those edges would be very difficult on my phone I'm just going to give you my own votes. So, basically, with their weapons the club versus a knife is a very interesting matchup, and whole it may seem obvious that the knife would win, the Inuit's armor would probably be too thick for the knife to easily pierce, and because of that the Inuit can easily apply blunt trauma to the assassin fairly easily while the assassin will struggle a bit more to get it done. That point goes to the Inuit.

For the mid ranged weapons, I'd give it to the Inuit as well. His mid range is definitely longer than what the assassin has, and while the poisoned blade may be a bit dangerous, it doesn't matter if he can't get close enough to nick the guy with the blade. The point would go to the Inuit, even with the limited mobility a harpoon causes.

Lomg range weapoms, if have to give it to the Inuit again due to the fact that it's a sling versus a bow. How is generally superior in every way along with the range and flexibility it allows. Point to the Inuit.

Though due to their experience in actual wars and such, the assassin takes the X factors.. They've fought romans, which is certainly better than fighting tribes, and only being in skirmishes. Sleds wouldn't really be useful for the Inuits though. Honestly considering tactics, I'd say that they're even.

Though, in the end INUIT RAIDER wins due to a superior arsenal, even if the assassin has more expeirence.