User blog:Codgod13/The Expednables vs RED

The expendables, the rag tag group of mercenaries who single-handely took down an entire army, vs RED, a group of retired agents who saved the US from corruption! WHO! IS! DEADLIEST!?

X Factors:
Physicality: 92

Training: 75 (except for christmas 94)

Experience: 85

Killer instinct: 75 (except for gunnar 100)

Teamwork: 88

Intelligence: 74

X Factors:
Physicality: 71

Training: 82

Experience: 96

Killer instinct: 80

Teamwork: 75

Intelligence: 90

My edges
melee: the throwing knife can be used from any direction and can be thrown while the garotte needs close range surprise. EDGE: the expendables.

close range: The guns are similar, but two are better than one. EDGE: the expendables.

mid range: The super 90 outclasses the super shorty in range and fire rate on its best day. But it and the MP5K are blown apart by the ripping firepower of the AA-12. EDGE: The expendables.

long range: The F2000's range is slightly inferior to the M16, but it is more compact. The diplomat I can find nodda info on, but is larger and less compact than the AUG, though probably has much more range. EDGE: even.

special: Despite it's inmanueverability, the M2HB is easily the most devestating weapon on the battlefield. EDGE: RED.

explosive: The M203 has much more range than the M67 and will explode on impact, as well as having multiple uses. EDGE: RED.

The deadliest warrior: The expendables. RED just doesnt bring the tools to win. While the M2HB will turn rhe mercenaries into swiss cheese, all of their other weapons fall short when compared to the expendables. Not to mention the fact the expendables have been working as a team longer and are much much younger and more physically fit. The M2HB is a huge obstacle, but liek they always do, the expendables will overocme and finish the job.