User blog comment:MilenHD/Cheyenne Dog Soldier vs Attila the Hun/@comment-17814994-20160620143956

Elgb's '"Wanna Play Horsey?" 'EDGES!!!

Short: Well sword of mars wins. While it's not the fabled sword that legend say it is, it's still a sword compared to a tomahawk. It's got a longer and more lethal blade, and it can keep the Cheyenne at a distance. While the tomahawk can be thrown it will leave the Cheyenne weaponless. EDGE: Attila

Mid: The spear is jsut more practical, and way deadlier, than a lasso. The lasso just lacks lethality, and Attila's use of it as a weapon is very limited. EDGE: Cheyenne

Long: The Indian bow is a small bow designed for speed than power. While it's strong enough to penetrate bison, it lacks the overall powe of a recurve bow such as Attila's. The Hunnic bow was designed for range and pwoer, and it's far more accurate and lethal than any short self-bow around. EDGE: Attila

Special: Funny thing but I gotta give this one to the axe. In terms of swinging weapons, an axe head is better than a spike. It can store more energy when it is swung, and when it hits it can dig deeper and wider wounds. The spike lacks the surface area and pwoer of an axe, it's blade has a chance of being stuck when it hits something. It also doesn't help that flailing a large rifle is cumbersome and lets you open for a counterattack. EDGE: Attila

Deadliest Warrior?

Gotta give this one to Attila. He's led and fought with a tougher and meaner group of warriors with generations of military lineage than the less-experienced Dog Soldiers. But what really gives him the victory here is that Attile was more successful in his war than the Indians. He fought a successful campaign against Rome and he won several pivotal battles that made its mark in military history. The Cheyenne dog soldiers did won some skirmishes, but they had more success attacking unarmed settlers than fighting an actual army. Against a guy like Attila, they have no chance.