Talk:Napoleon Bonaparte/@comment-176.151.16.240-20170106195408

"While Napoleon had weapons twenty years newer in age, Washington had the motivation of freedom that had proven a militia of small numbers to defeat an army of large numbers. Having such an experience, George Washington had what it took to beat Napoleon."

That's one way of cracking the French up! After sustaining the bloodiest revolution known to mankind (you don't have a monopoly on freedom, 'murica!), the French, partly under the command of Napoleon and driven by republican ideals, single-handedly defeated five coalitions of the most powerful nations on earth. But Washington (who owes the US independence to a Franco-American partnership, mind you) would obviously defeat one of the greatest generals in history "with the motivation of freedom"!

Anglo-Saxon propaganda never ceases to amaze me. American fanboys masturbating to the alleged greatness of their nation, either. That being said, this work of fiction is absolutely divine! Great prose; thoroughly enjoyable. Thrills and fun at every turn!