User blog comment:MilenHD/Comanche vs Maori/@comment-17814994-20160507114014

Elgb's "Badass Natives Who Put Up A Great Fight" EDGES!!!

Short: The mere club definately has more power, but it has a very short range and it needs to hit the head to efficiently kill someone. The warhawk on the other hand, while it can do piercing attacks, still ahs the advantage of its longer reach that will keep the enemy at bay. EDGE: Comanche

Mid: The taiaha has the advantage of range and reach, but it can easily break and lacks durability in the long fight. The war lance doesn't have the effective range but it's made of stronger materials that can deal more damage and lethality. EDGE: Comanche

Long: Hoerea lacks the actual range to be an effecitve long range weapon, and it also lacks the power. It does have the advantage of being able to be used as melee, but it still needs to get close. The bow has the range, accuracy and power, and if anyone questions that a self-bow may not be enough to kill a very tough Maori warrior, uou need to remember tat those bows were design to take down buffalo. EDGE: Comanche

Special: I give this one straight to the leiomano. The knife is deadly but you need to hit the vital parts in order to kill. Most of the time it will take more than one hit to kill. The leiomano has both blunt and slashing damage. And it's ability to rip through flesh means it can deal more damage and kill more effectively. EDGE: Maori

X-Factor: Training is practically the same for me both warriors trained from early age. The Maori does have the advantage of having a longer lineage that spans over centuries than the comanche, who were a relatively new tribe during the European conquest of America. But in terms of success, the Comanche beats the Maori. While they've killed their shares of other Native tribes, The Comanches fought successfully over the U.S. Army for generations while the Maori didn't really succeed that long. Their fight during the Texas-Indian Wars and the Red River War showed that they were smarter and more assymetrical than the Maori who can only charge in like maniacs. Besides, the Comanche was a tribal nation, while the Maori were made up of separate, often-warring tribes that were unorganzied. EDGE: Comanche

'Deadliest Warrior? '

The Comanche takes this rather easily with their better weapons and x-factors. Their steel weapons will beat the Maori's exotic bone, shark tooth and stone age weapones they have. The Comache were also far more successful and far more organized than the Maori. Their better guerilla style warfare which gave the U.S. Army a headache is better compared the Maori's primitive and not as successful resistance and brutality.