User blog comment:Swg66/Owain Glyndŵr vs. Genghis Khan/@comment-422690-20120617215423

Long Range: Recurve Bow wins. Similar to what's said above, they are both excellent bows. The Recurve, however, is more portable and can be used on Horseback. Edge: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!

Mid Range: Jida Lance wins, due to the fact that it can be used no foot. Owain's lance is a superior horseback weapon, no doubt, but despite what SoulCalibur III may lead you to believe, a lance is near-worthless on foot. The Jida, on the other hand, is more like a spear. Edge: Genghis Khan.

Close Range: Tie. Both are excellent swords, and the Longsword can be used both one-handed and two handed, but the Saber has an advantage when on a horse; a slicing motion is more likely to hit from horseback than a thrusting one. While the Longsword is as capable of hacking as it is stabbing, you just let the Saber do what it wants to. The Longsword has far more versatility on foot, and while that is a plus in most cases, on horseback it's a disadvantage.

Special: Warhammer wins. Maces are nice, light, and fast. Warhammers are a little more bulky, but can either put their force in a crushing blow on the hammer end or in an armor-piercing stab on the other. Edge: Owain Glyndŵr

X-Factors: Owain Glyndŵr takes the lead with an average of 82.2 over 80.4 (for those of you who are confused by why I put more weight on the average rather than the individual X-factors: the average shows, numerically, how effective the warrior was as a warrior within the parameters given)

Overall: Owain Glyndŵr wins. He has better armor and weapons that can pierce Genghis Khan's armor. It won't be an easy fight for him, but he should take it by a good margin, due to his technological superiority.