User blog comment:Pygmy Hippo 2/Genghis Khan vs. Hernán Cortés/@comment-36053634-20180819011418

Guitarcar's "The best conqueror vs A landlord with armor in mexico" edges

Swords:

The Espada ropera is made from european steel!!! Its like the old Longsword vs Katana wars all over again. Besides, the Espada can deliver more blunt trauma to Khan's armor

Edge: Hernan

Polearms:

The halberd can split up spear and break them. They are much versatile aswell and a 4 feet longer spear wont be a problem for the Halberd.

Major Edge: Hernan

Long range:

Im disagreeing with the arrow vs plate. Unlike the Knights of old, Hernan's conquistadors dont have their plate armor covering their entire body. The gun isnt fast in the reloading department either.

Edge: KHAAAAAAAAAAAAN

Armor:

A bunch of tiny pieces of plates connected to each other against a litteral full plate? This is obvious at this point.

Major edge: Hernan

X-Factor

Khan is much more experienced (He fought through kilometers towards europe man) and his tactics defeated the elite likes of the Teutonic/Templar/Hospitaller Knights and other heavily armor opponent. Hernan on the other hand was really a wealthy dude who stormed in mexico, got a bunch of kills, and then told the Scribes to write him down in history as an influential general.

Major Edge: KHAAAAAAAAAAN

Hernan: 3

KHAAAAAAAAAAN: 2

Sumarry:

Hernan's better armor and melee weapons will eventually beat the more experienced and skilled Mongolian leader. Khan will put up a fight, but if his arrows ran out, he's dead.

Winner: Hernan