User blog comment:Samurai234/Julius Caesar vs. Charlemagne/@comment-1017446-20110702014422

Omnicube1's Cubeliest Edges

Close Range: The seax definitely has that cutting and stabbing power. Plus it is relatively light and has greater length. However, it has a slender blade and won't have that extra umph when it comes to damage. The pugio has those wicked curves that when pulled out it'll definitely inflict some terrible pain and cause more bleeding. Edge: Julius Caesar

Mid Range: The sword of Charlemagne has greater length, stabbing, and cutting power. Like Swg66 said it is primarily a stabbing damage and doesn't do much damage against armor, especially plated armor. Edge: Charlemagne

Mid Range - Spears: My edge goes to the lancea. While it does lack length, it makes up for it in its capability to be thrown. Edge: Charlemagne

Long Range: I would've preferred it to be Lancea vs. Pilum, but I digress. The pilum was meant to damage shields and cause them to be unusable. Charlemagne could probably throw off more fransiscas then Caesar can throw off pilums. Edge: Charlemagne

Special: The dolabra I feel is the better special weapon. It can pierce through armor and cause nasty gashes. Edge: Caesar

The Deadliest Warrior: Charlemagne, his superiority in armor power will easily defend him from a majority of things Caesar is using. Charlemagne also has better piercing weapons like the Joyeuse and lancea.