User blog comment:El Alamein/Voldemort vs. General Grievous/@comment-5138827-20130925025722/@comment-422690-20130925174545

All forms of magic offense is easily countered by blocking with the Lightsaber, since it has, again, shown to be able to deflect or ground magical attacks.

As for countering getting his weapons trasfigured/banished, he has his own cybernetic body to just bash Voldemort. Since he can no longer block spells, he'll have to rely on his agility to dodge. Voldemort really hasn't shown a propensity for anything other than direct combat or torture spells, save Legilimancy (or however you spell it). This kind of nullifies this because Voldemort is simply not likely to use it.

The Fiendfyre is the biggest problem Grievous will face, but again his extreme speed can allow him to manoeuvre out of the way. And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Fiendfyre also incredibly difficult to control? If so, it can harm Voldemort just as easily as it can Grievous.

As for the Apparition, Grievous isn't just going to stand there blinking when Voldemort uses it. He's far more intelligent than that, and his enhanced brain will likely be able to find where Voldemort has gone fast enough to block.

A couple misconceptions to clear up:

Nowhere was I accusing you of insolence; I was simply explaining where Cfp was coming from in his accusation of bias and how you were hurting your own case.

And as for the "groupthink" thing, most staff (3 out of the 4 below are staff) do tend to think alike in many cases*, so we tend to agree with each other more often than not. We also realize when someone has said something better than we can, and usually point to them to show it. We also tend to discuss our votes and such on chat, so it's not surprising that we have similar opinions.

And we're not "making an issue" of your vote. That was just Cfp being stupid. I decided to give an explanation of why he was stupid, but felt like there should be a little more in the comment than just that.

As to returning an accusation of bias, I only show that in language. I do not let that affect my vote. I can't speak for the others, but I'm fairly sure they're the same way.

It's also nice to find a user who can debate intelligently. The others who can are all staff, and as mentioned I agree with them more often than not.

* (Great minds think alike and fools seldom differ. The trouble comes in figuring out which you are.)