User blog comment:Astrotorical/Blog of News: Masterchief vs. Wiki Grief/@comment-4555900-20120208202958/@comment-4555900-20120208210054

A year ban? Let us relax a little. There are a lot of Master Cheif battles on this site. It gets really old. So a year ban will let us relax, and may drive away the people that only come to see his battles or something like that, people that only vote for or against him without good reasoning. It won't cause any more battles or bias than what's already here, so that comment just makes no sense. As for how to regulate him, like I said, pay especially close attention.And with the admins having to approve the battle? So the battle will actually be fair. Like Master Chief vs. Iron Man. That battle was very unfair to Iron Man and was a clear indication that the author did not research anything about Iron Man. If we get admins to approve it, they will, hopefully anyways, research the fighters so they are represented better, essentially getting rid of unfair or misrepresented battles. That's about the only thing we can do if we don't want to perma-ban him. And I mentioned non-Chiefs voters in my two comments, so I already got that covered. And no, we should not ban anons from voting, that's not fair to them, or to the author. As I said before, pay very close attention to them, including if they're sock puppeting or not. Perma-banning Chief is not the only way, and honestly, gets rid of a great fighter, and some really good possible match-ups.