User blog comment:Tybaltcapulet/Michael Wittmannn vs Welkin Gunther/@comment-30243686-20190530014525/@comment-35680048-20190530112837

Adding onto my comrade's comment, i'd also like to say that even if I did still have voting open, your vote still wouldn't count for several reasons.

First, your spelling is quite bad, with several mistakes that make it much harder to read

Second, if you wish to show that Gunther has superior tactics in this battle, you're going to have to give more proof than "he mostly just follows other peoples planes". I literally provided an example of a battle where Wittmann specifically didn't just follow other people's planes. His most famous battle even, Villers-Bocage.

Third, one on one no prep? Umm, both of these are totally wrong. Both Wittmann and Gunther have (albeit limited) time to prepare, and both have knowledge of the battle, but not the exact details. And as for one v one, I have no clue what you mean there. You reference the fact that both of these commanders have men, so...

Fourth, while I won't argue that Welkin doesn't have a stronger bond with his men, (he's basically the Squad's dad), his ability to use the environment is rather limited in a head on battle, which is exactly what Wittmann is famous for doing (again Villers-Bocage). And its not like Wittmann is completely unfamilar with the land around him, this is Normandy and Wittmann has experience with the area.

Fifth, spotting animals? Where in this blog did I ever say that Welkin will have access to spotting animals? I can tell you if Welkin was to have access to such a valuable resource, I would've definitely stated that in the description of the battle itself.

Sixth, you completely ignore weapons, training, experience, and barely mention the men of both sides. This results in a vote that is uttely incomplete, and doesn't take in every necessary factor that should be taken into consideration. i.e how the WSS does against Squad 7, how the tanks stack up to each other, how the commanders function and how much experience they have etc.

Seventh, and finally, even if I didn't see all these glaring issues with your vote, I still wouldn't count it. Why? Well because at most you have 4 complete sentences, and my voting requirements are very clear on how to do a paragraph vote. "At least a 7 sentence paragraph detailing why you believe a certain warrior will win.". In my opinion this is quite fair for a voting requirement.

Overall, I would suggest that you not only take more time with your votes in the future, but to look at other voters and how they structure their votes to better understand how to write a vote up in the future. Believe me, it will make it much easier for you.

From the Soviet comrade, Tybaltcapulet