User blog comment:Leolab/Retroactive Unfair Battle Enforcement/@comment-6771148-20130506040205/@comment-4484220-20130507000154

That makes a bit more sense now, I was trying to figure out exactly how I should phrase my reply because I was confused about what post you were talking about. I am perfectly aware of the part of the blog post quoted just above, and have been ever since this blog post started.

What I'm still not clear on is where you stand here. You seem to be acknowleding the argument for it being unfair (based on your reference to the last 3 sentences of Evil's post), while also implying you think the solution is to redo it rather than remove it. I agree that a rematch should be done rather than a removal for battles that are unfair given the improper loadouts and X-factors, but would ordinarily be fair under proper representation. However, I do not feel the same way towards battles where it's the other way around; when it's fair given improper loadouts/x-factors, but unfair when properly represented. Mace Windu vs. the Arbiter is one of the latter.