Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-27245707-20160617002817/@comment-28493607-20160620201517

If you aren’t writing it, then who would? Establishing an author is pretty important if you expect the match to actually be redone.

Now I actually went and dug up the blog and its votes, and quite frankly a lot of its comments seem rather lackluster. Additionally, a user at the time the blog was being voted on mentioned that Sarah was winning only because of popularity. That user was AnnihilationNation, who would also go and argue with seemingly everyone that supported Sarah Connor. Thing is, none of those users actually replied to AN’s claims, and as El Alamein showed a week or so ago, arguments can lead voters to switching sides. The lack of responses to AN is what bothers me here. I feel that one should defend their viewpoint if challenged by another, especially whenever that’s the whole point of “What if” battles.

In other words, I think the idea of a rematch isn’t farfetched so long as a credible user volunteers to write the blog. OmniCube didn't include any information about the warriors involved or the weapons they were using, so whoever potentially does the rematch would want to add those in. This discussion really can't be had without actually looking at the blog, so I’ll include a link to it here for everyone to judge for themselves.



