User blog comment:Battlefan237/John Doe (Se7en) vs. Hannibal Lecter/@comment-3189283-20171014112530

I'm going to give this one straight to Hannibal. I doubt Firearms are going to play much of a role in this fight as neither Hannibal nor John Doe are particularily good marksmen which leaves the battle as a close quarters one and this is where Hannibal really shines. I don't know why Hannibal has a baton instead of one of his many knives but he's still the better close quarters fighter and I can see him being able to disarm John Doe and then trump him with his better hand to hand skills. Granted John is much younger and fitter but he's not much of a fighter and he's relying entirely on the element of surprise in order to get the upper hand. Plus with Hannibal's great manipulation skills it's entirely plausable that he could seriously fuck with John's mind and leave him vulnerable to a sneak attack of his own. Hannibal is simply the more experienced and successful serial killer.

Hannibal: 3,500

John Doe: 1,500