User blog comment:Laquearius/Deadliest Warrior Rematch: Alexander the Great vs Attila the Hun/@comment-27043000-20181120005115

Pygmy Hippo's "Ballista vs. Axe" Edges

Heavy Infantry:The Pezhetairoi have the advantage of a longer spear and the Hypaspists have a better shield and body armor along with giving Alexander's troops a numbers advantage. The Allied Infantry have their advantages as well with a better sword, tougher helmet, and ranged weapons but Attila's men can't match the combo. Edge:Alexander

Light Infantry:The Allied Skirmishers have more variety in ranged weapons and an equally durable shield but the Agrianian Peltasts have more troops, a helmet, and a backup melee weapon. The Allied Archers have the same bow as their opponents but also have a mich longer melee weapon in the spear but they lack shields which the Cretan Archers have and have less soldiers in their group. Edge:Alexander

Cavalry:The Hetairoi have a longer lance, a backup sword, and better body armor but the Allied Heavy Cavalry have a shield, better helmet, and are more numerous. The Horse Archers are completely decimated by the Hunnic Cavalry who have a better bow, backup weapons, and actual armor including a helmet and shield along with outnumbering their foes. Edge:Attila

X-Factors:Alexander the Great takes Experience due to having a longer career, never losing a battle, and arguably facing a greater variety of foes. Alexander the Great takes Leadership as well due to his men believing him to be divine and having additional commanders to help while Attila is either a good ruler to the Huns or rules his allies with fear. Attila the Hun takes Metallurgy as Iron is better than bronze but Alexander does use iron as well but only for his weapons. Alexander the Great takes Training due to his army training all of the time with greater discipline and Attila's Huns being the only troops who regularly train for war. Edge:Alexander

Tactics:Attila the Hun has shown himself to be unable to win every battle he was in as previously stated and Alexander the Great has defeated horse archers before with a strategy that Attila hasn't seen before. Edge:Alexander

Final Verdict:Looks like Deadliest Warrior was wrong again abd Alexander the Great is emerging victorious in this army battle. Attila the Hun's only advantages are his obviously better horse archers and superior overall metallurgy but he has lost battles before. Alexander not only knows how to counter horse archers but also has never been defeated and his infantry reign supreme in combat. He also has the most important X-Factors in experience, training, leadership, and tactics which increases his advantage over Attila even more. The Great's no stranger to odd foes but the Hun's in for a rude awakening against a far more capable general than his regular foes.

Winner:Alexander the Great

P.S.:Can I ask for a vote trade for Brotherhood of Nod vs. Soviet Military?