User blog comment:So-Pro Warrior/Time to Get Back to Things! Season 1-Battle 11: SEAL Team Seven vs. Task Force 141/@comment-5795750-20141113115243

BG1's "Who Dares Wins" Edges:

Melee: I guess its better to have a multitude of fighting styles from across the globe and be well-trained in them as opposed to simply being well-trained in just one (which I'm guess is CQC)

EDGE: 141

Close: USP may not have as many rounds as the P226 but its lighter and its got the more powerful round

EDGE: 141

Long: For the purpose of this vote, I'm going to take the rifles as they are without attachments with that being discussed later. For now...

I agree with Skull on this one - the ACR is packing the more powerful shots behind it with a higher muzzle velocity and while (my thoughts now) its RoF is higher than the M4A1 and its a bit heavier than the M4A1, it was suggested as a viable alternative/successor to the M4A1 because of its compactness and power

EDGE: 141

Extra Long: A sniper version of the AR-15 vs a sniper version of the M14? Well on initial glance they are the same in terms of stats but upon doing further research I just think that the TAC20 is similar to the AR-15 in terms of practicality while the Mk 14 has been praised for good-quality ergonomics and low recoil - perhaps greater than that of the TAC20

EDGE: 141

Special: M249 is the more powerful gun of the two with a max range exceeding that of the PKP; also the Pecheneg is heavier to carry if it has a tripod mount attached to it (sure you can hold it with one hand like Rambo as I found out but that's not THAT practical in combat) than a fully loaded M249

EDGE: 7

Explosive: Funny how you gave both sides one-shot rocket launchers but I have to give it to the AT4 for being the more sophisticated/newer launcher with a greater range and more powerful warhead - heck much like the ACR & M4A1 situation, the AT4 was designed to be a replacement for the M72 LAW; I understand that in a previous battle where an AT4 was involved I said that there would be issues with the AT4 concerning back blasts but so far the 141 has had no problem with the launcher

EDGE: 141

Equipment - Attachments vs UAV + Attachments: First the sights - and I have to say that a combined holographic and ACOG sight does a better job at it than a simple red dot sight; the bipods are fine on the weapons they are attached to - especially considering that with the PKP on the bipod it would not be as heavy as I said it would be; the foregrip is certainly useful and so are the suppressors but I suppose the suppressor is more useful on the ACR because a) it gives the 141 a stealth advantage and b) its stats aren't affected a great deal with the addition; the laser module is going to be somewhat problematic as it as good a giveaway clue as it is a distractor; and now the role the UAV may play... I say that the UAV's autopilot can be used to good effect if the situation required the UAV to go from point A to point B and not (as I think would happen here) around in a circle which would definitely require a user then and that would leave about 6 men in the SEAL Team instead of the full 7

EDGE: 141

X-Factors: Average of 95.83 for ST7, Average of 97.17 for TF141

EDGE: 141

Overall Winner: There's just one thing I'd like to point out in your scenario - you say that its taking place before MW2 for the 141 (and presumably before Operation Kingfish)... doesn't that mean that they haven't started their search for Makarov yet or even had Shepard betray them coz with that in mind the numbers are probs going to be altered (in my view at least)... I'll give my final verdict later coz I am confused