User blog comment:Dewaynehall235/Los Zetas vs ISIS/@comment-27358240-20190630114845

I gotta say, your information has improved A LOT compared to before. I've checked myself and all weapons are used by their respective users. I would, however, advice detailing a tad bit more the X-Factors. For example, if both are making millions through drugs and oil, why do the Zetas have superior logistics? Small things like that. Also, try uploading your own pics if you can't find them on the wiki. That helps not only you but everyone who wants to use pics of the weapon later. You can start improving your battle format itself after that. For now, however, congrats.

Kazanshin's "Scums of humanity" edges:

Melee: A bloody chainsaw against a knife. The winner is clear, right? The chainsaw is big, heavy, clumsy and you can't carry a gun while having one. You can carry a full load of guns while carrying a bowie knife and quickly be effective with it. What? Surprised? The chainsaw really isn't an effective weapon, honestly. Too much effort put into something that could be done with way less. Edge: ISIS

Mid-range: This isn't too hard to figure out. It's an actual battle carbine vs a submachine gun. AKS had every advantage (literally) apart from weight and gets the edge. There's not much to say, really. Edge: ISIS

Long range: The Type CQ is basically a complete copy of the M16, which makes it very similar to the M4A1. However, one advantage the American version has is range. The CQ has a maximum range of 480 meters while the M4 has an effective range of 500 meters. This is a big difference. The CQ has a small advantage in muzzle velocity, but it's nowhere near enough to make up for the range, and by extension accuracy, difference. Edge: Los Zetas

Explosives: The IED is less cumbersome, easier to use and just overall better suited for a battle like this. Edge: ISIS

X-Factor and Final Verdict: This should be a relatively safe victory for the ISIS. Both have military.paramilitary style training and have an overall close level in X-Factors, but the Islamic terrorists have the better weapons by a longshot. The biggest advantage here is tht they have two assault rifles instead of one, which will be a big advantage. That, added to a far more compact melee weapon, a better suited explosive and more experience fighting a waaaaay wider variety of enemies (the Zetas only mainly fight the Mexican military, which is far less well equipped and supplied than US, Canada, UK and other countries involved in the war on terror), will give them a decisive advantage when it comes to such a battle. Deadliest Scum: ISIS