User talk:HaydenStudios

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background:-moz-linear-gradient(center top, #000000 60%, #470000 100%); border: 2px solid darkred; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

The War is On
Welcome to the war at Deadliest Fiction Wiki, there's much to be done so come on board and join the fight. Here's some tips that may help you here:


 * Rules of the Wiki Know the rules of the wiki and to know what to do and what not to do.




 * Recent Changes See what's going on around here and what other editors have been working on.


 * Need help or want to report a vandal? Contact any of the administrators here.


 * Policies To better understand our wiki, check out our policies.


 * Sign In every time you edit!

-- MrPacheco101 (Talk) 19:54, September 27, 2011
 * }

Re: How to properly do a rematch
First off it's okay not to have X-factors or experts' opinions considering it's not a part of the rules, and all my battles don't have any of that stuff. Second, you can make the battle like it's a new fight, there's no need to put "rematch" on it, but you can if you want. One day voting is OK, but it is implied that the voting period should be longer then one day. Both Lasmoore and Jwarrior89 are right, just change the weapons so that it won't be the same thing over again. Finally, it is fine to disregard the events of the previous fight. Hope this helps, 01:59, October 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well they are both right since all you need to do is change the weaponry. The change can literally be just two different weapons. 23:28, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

Duke vs. Rico
About that, I'm still going to do it, it's just that I have a TON of battles before that one. I'll prove it. Go here. KevlarNinja 00:47, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

wanna join chat
wana join chatTomahawk23 01:24, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

properly listing names
dude all the things aren't soupose to be in the same scentence your soupose to know when each fight cameTomahawk23 00:42, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Answer on Listing Names
First of all do not listen to Tomahawk at all, because he doesn't know what he's talking about. To answer your other question. All the warriors victorious are placed in his Win track and all of his defeats in his Lost track.( It can be placed chronologically or alphabetically or however way you want.). Its really fucking simple, so don't press too hard.

19:08, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Reply to Pacheco's answer
theres no rule about it but its better to have it in order so it does'nt look like they won a bunch then just lostTomahawk23 21:04, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Properly listing names
It really doesn't matter at all. You can just say "Victorious over B, C, and E. Defeated by D." As long as users visiting the page know who that warrior lost to and/or won over. 22:36, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Reply to your post on Omni's talk page
HS the training thing for rematchs its not about if the warrior had better training its if he won by it however that is debatble so it is up to the author to decide if training was a factor in the warriors victory and you can do a rematch if a warrior won by any x-factor unless he won due to his supior trainingTomahawk23 02:16, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Information on Ramatches and Loadouts for Wizards
Thanks for voicing your concerns! First, I was planning to add the rematch section to the Battle Policy but I've been lazy and haven't done it. Second, a battle no longer becomes a part of an author's work after two months, not one. Next, if a user has not been active for two or more months following or during the publishing of their battle, that battle can be redone without author permission. Fourth, I like your proposed rule so I'll put it up. For the X-factors, I don't think I said anything about the actual scores, just that if a warrior won by better training the battle can't be done since training is static and cannot be changed. If the inactive user returns after two or more months, the rematch is still legal because that user was inactive. For the battle by Thunderchin, if there were no votes before his completing of the battle then it was an illegal battle. For your suggestion about sorcerers and wizards, I believe that their powers must be limited considering they might pack powers that can cause instant death and cannot be overridden by their opponents' powers, thus making the fight unfair. However, I might publish a blog about this subject to see what others think.

I am doing well thanks for asking, and you're quite welcome! :D 03:05, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * I support the amount of supporters for a rematch idea. For the training issue, I believe if you can really prove that the author had the training completely wrong then you can do a rematch, but you must obtain a certain amount of supporters. I'll definitely make a blog about this tomorrow. In the blog, I'll definitely bring up the wizard power issue and see how the wiki will react. Again, thanks for voicing your concerns, seems like you're the only one right now! 07:00, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

RE: Message on Omni's talk page

 * Well Leo answered and I would like to keep those pages as they are, they have the formal name of the warriors. Even though they're better known by those names, it's more formal that way. 02:01, January 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah that's what I meant, sorry I didn't interpret your question right. 02:20, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Look up your Fracken Info
Dude, you need to look up information before you make a blog like that. You need to know the difference between a clip and a magazine and that a larger round has more range than a smaller one... Sith-venator Wavingstrider  ( Commlink ) 19:26, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
Yeah I think it is that time. I'll edit it tomorrow when I collaborate all the ideas together. 01:40, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
As the message on my talk page clearly states, I'll be busy with school work! Yay!!!! 02:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

/me crashes car
Firstly, the idea was all the battles on his page were to be deleted UNTIL his ban was over

Secondly, After the ban was implemented (which did infact get support) i stopped looking at the blog. It was meant for him being banned, and that was it. So obviously i didnt see reason to check it.

Thirdly, you could have just asked nicely. something like "Oh, pardon me, but pach said the battles shouldnt be deleted. So can ya fix that up? thanks."

So ill fix it up, but next time dont type up a message that sounds like your going to throw a spear at me

The End.

I hadnt actually deleted the battles, just the ones shown on his page. The blogs are still there. Now SWG hadnt known because at the time, I hadnt any activity from him. So if he was lurking he should have checked the Admin Page. If you want to edit his page, then by all means go ahead. Doing it my way is apparently too far

Re: Hulk vs. Solomon Grundy
Actually, there was a poll on the battle, I counted both the comments and the poll, and the results were, that Hulk got 2 comment votes and 3 poll votes, but Grundy got 6 poll votes, so with that I declared Grundy the winner, I deleted the poll to make room for the battle, so I see why you misunderstood.

Re: Kenshin Himura vs. Conan the Barbarian
Well I told everone that all of my battles are offcially off limits, but after reviewing your past battles (wich are lirerally TWO battles by the way, with the latest one being your most successful and yet contraversial mtch up you did.) I'm willing to reconsider. Yes I'll let you do the match-up, but I would like to supervise the information given to Conan The Barbarian before posting.

P.S.Yes I agree with you about the battle, by that time my Rurouni Kenshin and Conan info was a bit rusy back then because I laked very good sites to go to then. No, I disagree with you about Kenshin being the real victor of the fight I have read the entire Rurouni Kenshin manga series and the first 33 issues of Savage Sword of Conan, and trust me...Conan defiently deserved the victory more than Kenshin

20:09, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
That was a system enacted a long time before you were here. That was supposed to be sort of a "crown" to show that he won my tourney, it doesn't mean he's the best overall, just the best in my tourney.

For your second part, if it was Alan vs. the Predator directly then it wouldn't count. Just because Rambo was beaten by the Predator and defeated the other two doesn't make the Predator necessarily better than Rambo's other competitors.

00:39, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Properly setting up a page
Okay I read your message and it's very through. so here's my answer.

This is how the criteria is suppose to go

1. use the latest Infobox made recently by Omnicube, which is the black/gray one

2. Have a History section, powers/abilities or weapons section depending on the warrior(Note: if it's a wizard you can use a link to their power section on another site if you can't summarize.), and a list of battles he or she have won or lost. There's no chronological order, it's just whoever get's the chance to post their battle on their page if they get a chance (since most people don't have time since they have busy.). you can arrange the battle order however you want there's no specific way.

3. For Battle Status, it's preferable to go Battles currently being held, victories, losses, and then ties, but some people might do it diffrently to make it easier for other people.

If there's any more questions that I have not answer please notify me

00:44, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
Kenshin still retains his super-human like speed in both his anime and manga character, but Kenshin vs. Samurai Jack sounds like a much better option. another one will be Kenshin vs. Ogami Itto, the lone assassin who slew a hundred lords heads from Lone Wolf and Cub.

06:26, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
I wouldn't say Kenshin has "super-human speed". more like "near" super-human to be exact. Honestly there are several reasons why I think Conan is the overall winner, however I will like to state my reasons when the battle is near. Although I can give several key-factors though for Conan's victory: Training, Fighting Prowess, and Enviorment.

20:27, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

A Devil Rides In Kyoto!​
Midnight Carnival straying away from the modern times of guns and power phasers to the good ol' 19th century Old West with this All-Star cast....

Jonah Hex : Easily one of the most skilled bounty hunter in the world, Jonah Hex has made his name notorious in the Old West with his uncanny marksmanship and his own disfigured face.

&

Himura Kenshin: Known as the legendary "Battoai The Man-Slayer" throughout Japan, Kenshin Himura has made a name for himself as the legendary assassin working for the revolution group Ishin Shishi during the end of the Edo period (See the Batkumatsu for more detail.). He now uses his sword to protect the innocent and to never kill again as retrobution for his crime. http://deadliestfiction.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:MrPacheco101/A_Devil_Rides_In_Kyoto:_Jonah_Hex_%26_Himura_Kenshin Your vote will really be appreciated.

04:53, April 24, 2012 (UTC)~

Re:
For your first question, the expert's opinion should be kept intact to show the differing beliefs and not everyone will have the same opinion. It will be awkward to change what someone else believed to be true in that fight.

For your second question, the three supporters rule doesn't apply when the original author is inactive considering they really won't have a say in things. 22:18, May 12, 2012 (UTC)

- LeoLab 04:20, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

An expert's opinion
Hey, I was wondering, as you seem to favor Iron man in the battle Verses Terry, would you mind writing an expert's opinion for me? it would be greratly appriciated ▬▬Arrow▬► 21:54, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

RE: RE: Expert's Opinion
Yeah sure thats fine▬▬Arrow▬► 23:40, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Happy Anniversary DF
In celebration of the wiki's second anniversary on the 22nd, you receive this special badge. You can place it on your user page using the code You also receive

--▬▬Arrow▬► 20:57, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Expert's opinion for Iron Man
Hey, I was wondering if I caould get that Experts's opinion For Iron Man vs Batman. Terry's Exoert (Pach) is ready to give his. (the battle is only a few days old as well) ─Arrow→ 03:21, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

RE:
Hey Don't worry about it. I understand ─Arrow→ 03:56, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Firstblood award
You have received FirstBlood award and may place it on your user page using the code

—Arrow→ 20:55, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

RE:Just a thought...
Yeah thanks for reminding me, I'll add it to the tutorial shortly.

As for the anniversary logo, I believe the plan was to leave it for the month of July (the 22nd is the anniversary), and I'm not entirely sure what you mean. We did away with the SOPA image already and after the end of the month the normal wordmark will go back up like before. —Arrow (talk) → 19:19, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Was Hoping For Your Help On Something...
Hey Hayden! I've been thinking a lot about a replacement battle for Voldemort vs. Kratos since someone beat me to the punch on that one, and I finally settled on something. I would like to pit Voldemort against Wailord, the water type Float Whale Pokemon. I know this sounds a little off kilter, but stick with me here- I've chosen Wailord because he is the epitome of his element, and is a capable melee fighter in addition to being excellent in the water. He may be big, but his Water Veil would work as a shield against some of Voldemort's spells and his Pressure ability would cause Voldemort to run out of steam as he cast more spells. I think it's a fairly close match, despite the odd sound. Leo is already doing the expert opinion/argument in Wailord's favor, and I thought I'd turn to you to do the same for Voldemort. What do you think? --Drayco90 (talk) 03:02, August 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh believe me, I have nothing but time to wait. I have a /lot/ of battles on my plate, so this isn't something of urgent need. I just wanted to run the idea by you. Enjoy your vacation! -Drayco90 (talk) 04:14, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congratulations you have earned the award for making 2,500 edits! You can place it on your page using the code.

—Arrow (talk) → 02:51, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

WanderingSkull Needs Help....Again
Here you go Hayden hope ya fix this for me. Sorry for not getting this to you earlier but you know stuff to do place to be. A owe ya one and have a nice day partner. Signature was supposed to be placed here saying: WanderingSkull (talk) 03:17 September 16, 2012 (UTC)

Alright, now it's fixed. In case you're Wandering how I did it, I changed:

"|Close



Chainsaw"

to:

"|-


 * Close



Chainsaw"

So, it's fixed now. Also, next time you make a talk page edit please put " ~ " at the end so that people can identify who left that message. Of course, I know it's from you because I received an E-mail saying whodunnit, and also because I was expecting it, but not everyone will have it that easy. So anyway, there you go.

HaydenStudios (talk) 05:15, September 16, 2012 (UTC)

Ban the son of a b*tch!
The anon has yet again made dick jokes of a users battle. Make it so that he can't anymore at all.

Sincerely, --BeastMan14 (talk) 19:51, December 10, 2012 (UTC)

I'm just wondering, how do I set up a voting poll on my blog page, John Marston vs. Niko Bellic? Also, If there is one there, can you please tell me ho to access it?

Mikeylango (talk) 01:59, February 10, 2013 (UTC)Mikeylango