Talk:Russian Mafia/@comment-422690-20130418015900/@comment-4484220-20130418021929

"Hayden, when a Bureau tells you not to do something, the last thing you should do is argue it." Unless of course, the rule regarding articles we've agreed upon favors me.

You and I had opposing views regarding expert's opinions on pages for battles when the revamping project got started, if you recall. Eventually, you me, I believe Drayco also, and possibly Leo as well came to the agreement that you could not edit the expert's opinions written by the blog post owner without their permission. However, we also agreed that if the author did not write an expert's opinion, then anyone is allowed to write one below the battle. These are the unwritten rules regarding expert's opinions that were agreed upon on chat.

Whenever I've been revamping pages, there's no expert's opinion, and I am not suited to write one myself, I put on the pages for the warriors, "Please consider a contribution by writing an expert's opinion as to why (insert victor here) won." The expert's opinion that Aroniese wrote was for a battle that didn't have one. This is perfectly consistent with the policies that I am almost positive we agreed upon a while back.

"And frankly I don't believe we ever came to a consensus that adding messages to a a blog telling people write an expert's opinion where there was none was ever okay." Who ever said I was writing a message to a blog? That message, written on the warrior pages, is directed at anyone who has free time, and is capable of writing an expert's opinion.