User blog comment:Leolab/Retroactive Unfair Battle Enforcement/@comment-5422903-20121124222758/@comment-4484220-20121124233002

1.? . Certainly not the best match-up, but ? I wouldn't say Cap (MCU) vs. MC was necessarily unfair. Yes, MC did have a better arsenal, but Captain was able to hold his ground against an alien species about as hostile as the Covenant. As long as Cap placed his shield in the right place, he could withstand almost anything the Chief could throw at him. MCU Cap also has super-human strength, speed, and durability. It wasn't a great matchup, but I wouldn't say it was unfair.

2.? . See my explanation in my comment above.

3.? . See my explanation in my comment above.

4.? . I don't know.

5. . Forgot about this one- thanks for reminding me. It all comes down to one thing: avada kedavra. One hit from this, and Predator's dead. Voldy can instantly kill the predator with so many different spells, and can effortlessly counteract anything the Predator can throw at him. This is completely unfair.

6.? . I don't need to explain. God warrior vs. Normal warrior is this wiki's definition of unfair.

7.? . Both warriors were normal human beings. Some people exaggerate Duke's abilities and say that he's super-human, but that is a bit of a stretch. Rambo was far better trained, had much better stealth, agility, and really just dominated most of the important X-factors. The only thing that made this a win for DUke was his highly superior arsenal and greater strength. This wasn't too hard of a win for Duke, seeing as how he left the battlefiels victorious hardly scathed, but by no means was it unfair. Until you get more supporters for this, I will not believe that I'm only saying this because this is my battle.