User blog comment:El Alamein/Voldemort vs. General Grievous/@comment-5138827-20130925025722/@comment-422690-20130925130814

Not too sure where you get that Avada Kedavra will break a lightsaber. The most any attack that has hit the blade has done is shut it off for a couple seconds, and even then Grievous has four of them and the presence of mind to turn it back on. I understand that it breaks physical objects, but the actual physics around a lightsaber are shaky. Plasma is superheated gas, so it technically shouldn't be able to touch anything. Yet it has shown the ability to slice through objects. This is explained by some psuedo-techincal talk, but it still means that assuming a lightsaber will react the same as more mundane objects isn't very good logic. Assuming magic - a mystical force comparable to Force use - can be countered by a lightsaber, which has been shown to counter the Force, is an acceptable leap in logic.

And one other thing - you're severely underestimating the computing power of Grievous's cyborg-enhanced brain. He is able to calculate and counter Mace Windu's Vaapad style while fighting him. This is a style which has been described as striking so fast that there appears to be multiple blades at the same time. Grievous may have no prep time, but he needs very little.

And just to be clear on one thing - your long-winded insistence that you like Grievous better and that you know a lot about him actually works against you. It makes you look like you're trying to say that you have no bias to cover the fact that you do. I prefer not to assume bias unless it's clear *cough*Hayden*cough*, but I can see where Cfp is coming from.