User blog comment:Marcus Forelli/Batman (Nolanverse) vs Sherlock Holmes/@comment-4484220-20130329203153/@comment-110.55.1.207-20130330024903

Don't mind the X-factors much as they are pretty much from my opinion. Its the voters and experts that can give their own factors.

As for the combat exerience Holmes edge is just a wash. But I gave him the edge because I've read many Sherlock stories from the original to the movie tie ins. In many of these stories it is said that Holmes sarted his career in his mid 20s. In the Game of Shadows novelization Mycroft said that Holmes started his career in the British inelligence starting out as a street urchin to his adolesence or something. Bruce witnessed his parents killed before him in the age of 8, and 14 years for him to leave Gotham and start training. So his was 22 years old when he started his traininng and probably in his 30s when he already don the Batman. But that's just my opinion its the voters who can choose. Also in the stealth, I gave Holmes the edge because though Batman is a ninja guy, a person like Holmes who can infiltrate his enemies (even the great criminal geniuses), fool them into thinking his someone else, grab their info, and use it against him is great. In the first movie he fooled Moriarty and Irene (and also me and others who was completely not expecting that) by disguising himself as a beggar from pieces of trash he found along the way. And in the ending scene in the second movie the bastard actually made himself invisible. I gave him the edge but seriously that was just a slight edge. Its the voters who can make the call, I only gave some hints.