User blog comment:Arrow7000/Crimson Lance vs. Cerberus/@comment-4882127-20120406191539

Epicenter Six's Epic Edges:

Basic: Even- both groups are about the same. Cerberus has silghtly better shields, but weaker armor and vice versa for the Lance. Weapons-wise about the same. Both are accurate submachine guns that lack some power.

Fortified: Cerberus- As individuals, Badass wins, no contest. But, in a team match like this, the Centurion's smoke grenadees will be invaluable and bloocking them from view and they can see through the smoke.

Defenders: Cerberus- While the Crimson Lance has the more powerful and accurate weapon, it's only two shot. Combine that with the fact he has the smaller shield and Cerberus better tactics and it's a easy win for Cerberus.

Support: Even- It all comes down to how fast the Cerberus Engineer can set his turrant can set his turrant up. If he set it up in times, than they will dominant, but if he's to slow he won't put it up in time and they lost a valuable asset.

Mechs: Crimson: I'm barely giving this too them. Atlas is a weaker mech while the Devestator has better defenses. Weapons-wise the Atlas has rockets and machine guns while Dev has Twin Shotguns. These Shotty's are capable of having a blowback effect by knocking the opponet over. If that happens, the Atlas is screw.

Overall: Cercerus- Cerberus uses better tactics and slightly better soldiers to give them the win.