User blog comment:Ssdmarista/John Hunyadi vs Godefroy de Bouillon/@comment-17814994-20161024052558

Elgb's "Men At Arms" EDGES!!!

Sword: I don't see what the fucking difference with the two swords. The longsword itself is technically a double-edged sword so it's kinda hard tod ecide which of these two are superior. EDGE: Even

Mid: The Hungarian axe is jsut a big axe stuck to a pole. The halberd on the other hand can act as an axe, a spike and a spear if it needs to. EDGE: Godfrey

Long: Ah yes the old handcannon vs crossbow debate. Like always, I'm giving the edge to the handcannon. While it's not as reliable as the crossbow and it takes more time to reload, at least it's absolute that its high calier round will penetrate every shield or armor the opponent is wearing, and I doubt the crossbow can do the same. Also, the sheer psycholgical factor of being bombared by loud thunderous volleys of crossbow will be a nightmare to Godfrey and his men. EDGE: John Hunyadi

Deadliest Warrior?

No x-factors, no pictures of the weapons and again little to no dtails about the weapons and warriors. Again, I'm pretty disappointed that you have done nothing to improve this battle author. Anyways, I'm giving the edge to John Hunyadi simply because he's got better technology in his arsenal, sucha s steel plate armor and hand cannons. Godfrey is a good tactician, but John Hunyadi ahs fought against far more pwoerful enemeis such as the Ottoman Empire and won. I see the Hungarian national hero getting the edge over this old crusader.