User blog comment:HanSolo69/American Sniper battles White Feather! Chris Kyle vs. Carlos Hathcock/@comment-4661256-20150420045454/@comment-5078776-20150422035843

1) The Winchester, I'm assuming, has little more than it's basic scope. Meanwhile, the MacMillan can be equipped with an adjustable bipod, an optional sling, a Mk 4 3-10x40mm M1 Mil Dot scope (translated as super fucking precise), and the .338 Lapua Magnum round, which is a significant bit larger than the .30-06 Springfield.

Also; I really shouldn't have to explain this, but fine. The M4A1 has a more compact shape for urban battlefields, has apparently a larger magazine, and can be equipped with a wide variety of optics. The Sig is significantly more advanced, but there is a key difference that should be realized; it's got a helluva lot more bullets than Hathcock's Colt. Noticing the trend with weapons?

2) Yiu can't just ignore the argument about the men's training; it is, after all, a pretty important factor.

3) Just to be clear; are you actually trying to beat the fairness challenge, or simply try to make sure the proposal is done right?