User blog comment:MilenHD/Yeoman Archer vs Persian Archer/@comment-3189283-20150826105626

Let's see shall we

Short Range 

The Bastard Sword is longer and heavier, meaning it will do more damage when swung but it's also not as quick to swing as the Acinaces. However the Bastard Sword is also made of the stronger and more reliable metal here which gives it the edge.

Edge: Yeoman Archer 

Mid Range

The Quarterstaff is not going to be very effective it this battle due to it's unwieldiness and the fact that it can only do blunt damage and and not even very good blunt damage. The Spear is not only going to be easier to get a kill with it's also easier to wield and can be thrown, giving the Persian a lot of options in the heat of battle.

Edge: Persian Archer

Long Range 

No contest here really. The Longbow has the further range and the higher penertration power, hell these things were rumored to go though both a knight and his horse.

Edge: Yeoman Archer 

Special Weapon

I always find Daggers to be mostly useless in match-ups such as these at it would make much more sense to just use your sword as it's longer. The Sagaris is both larger and more damaging and has more chance of getting through the Yeoman's armour than the Dagger will.

Edge: Persian Archer

X Factors 

The Yeoman Archer has an average of 86.25 whereas the Persian Archer has an average of 91.

Edge: Persian Archer 

Final Verdict 

It's a close call but I'm going to side with the Persian Archer. The Yeoman has the better weaponry overall including that all important archery edge but the Persian just seems to be the better trained and more skilled of the two and he also has the superior armour which all comes together to just snatch him the victory.

Persian Archer : 2,600

Yeoman Archer : 2,400