User blog comment:Kaiser of Metcalfer/Ewoks vs Hobbits/@comment-3189283-20150905163939

Let's see shall we

Melee

The Short Sword has the clear reach advantage over the stone hatchet and is also made of the stronger and more lethal material. Yeah the hatchet can be thrown but that disarms the Ewoks of a weapon and doesn't really improve it's lethality.

Edge: Hobbits 

Mid Range

The Cudgel is literally just a stick. Not a club, just a big heavy stick. It's not a very effective weapon especially since the Hobbit's are not exactly strong enough to do proper damage with it. The Stone Spear is primitive but it's also an effective killing weapon and could be thrown as an alternate usage.

Edge: Ewoks

Long Range 

I'm going to side with the Short Bow. I have no clue on the range or stats of the bow being used by the Ewoks but as it's primitive I can't imagine it will be have the range nor stopping power of the short bow. The Ewoks may have poisoned arrows but if they can't get in range to use it then it doesn't really matter and it isn't specified if the toxin is fast or slow acting so I don't even know how effective that will be.

Edge: Hobbits 

Special 

The Sling winning a weapons comparison??? What is this madness! Seriously though the only thing more useless than the Sling is just straight up throwing the rocks. The Sling at least gives some degree of accuracy and killing potentional. Throwing rocks! Really!

Edge: Ewoks 

Final Verdict 

Contray to what my edges show I'm going to give this battle to the Ewoks. The Hobbits may be packing the better quality weapons but they aren't exactly known for their combat prowess and I doubt they'll be able to use them very effectively. The Ewoks's are at least a trained warrior race and have shown great sucess in beating more technologically advanced foes with their primitive weaponry.

Ewoks: 3,000

Hobbits: 2,000