User blog comment:Leolab/Retroactive Unfair Battle Enforcement/@comment-4098900-20121125021722/@comment-4844014-20121207222924

Sorry it's late -

1, 2 and 3,  Seriously, Army vs. Special Forces? The construct of special forces is to be more diverse, unique, mobile, skilled, better equipped and more capable than a military unit. The foundation of special forces is to do what the army can't. This dosen't just support retardation, it counters ideas of the special forces battles trend set by Deadliest Warrior. When US Navy SEALs vs. Israeli Commandos (Sayeret Matkal) appeared on the Deadliest Warrior, the idea of special forces vs. special forces formed it's own section. That's why people today demands battles like SAS vs. Delta Force if there was a season 4, because a special forces section has become present in the Deadliest Warrior trend and bearing in mind were sort of based off Deadliest Warrior, sureley we need to uphold the ideas, regualtions and battle ideas they have. We don't do knights vs. special forces do we? We don't do cavemen vs. colonial marines?

We don't because it's not the suitable idea. The suitable idea which was has become an established trend by Deadliest Warrior is for warriors of the same proffesion or history to compete so USMC vs. Spetsnaz dosen't work. The reason US Navy SEALs vs. Israeli Commandos happend is because they're two special forces units. The reason Vampires vs. Zombies happend is because they're two human based monsters. The reason Nazi Waffen-SS vs. Viet Cong happend is because they're two of the toughest enemies America has ever faced. I'm supporting this because as a site established off Deadliest Warrior, we surely need to follow their trends and ideas like matching warriors of the same formation or that have significant similarties like SEALs vs. Commandos, they're both skilled special forces in the modern worlds. Sure USMC and Spetsnaz are military based but it counters the trend establised by Deadliest Warrior and it makes the battle stupid.