User blog comment:Omnicube1/Concerning....Many Things/@comment-4555900-20120111221217/@comment-4555900-20120112003149

This is just hypothetical by the way, I'm fairly certain most wizards and such wouldn't have one all-destroying spell that they could use to wipe the other fighter out instantly, but I only brought this up because I'm sure that at some point in the future, this will come up. I guess the easier way to do this would be, allow the author all rights to make their battle however they want, any spells that said wizard has and anything, as long as the other fighter is equally powerful. Kinda what you said Hayden I know, but still, it would work out for everyone. And also, allow them to ban said all-destroying spell if they so decide, as long as the wizard still has a chance of defeating their opponent. To put it simply, as long as each of the fighters have a chance to win, then it should be okay, regardless of what spells are allowed and not allowed, that way, no one is screwed over. It'll be the job of the author to figure out how to set up the battle so that each stand a chance to win. Besides, isn't one of the rules that the battle can't be too one-sided? This is kinda just a revised version of that rule really. Just expanded to specify some guidelines on how a wizard's powers are included.