User blog comment:Deathblade 100/The Generals Collide: Genghis Khan vs Sun Tzu/@comment-26833833-20150815153033

mongol no fear china



Long Range 

You've made a mistake with the range of the Composite Bow which actually has close to quadruple the range provided here. The Mongol's were expert archers and Genghis is no different and he should have little trouble penetrating Sun Tzu's armour from a range. The Chu Ko Nu not only has a much shorter range but I don't know how effective it will be against the steel armour of Genghis. especly mongol bow has much greater fire rate mongol conposite bow has 600+yard range attck

Edge: Genghis Khan  not even close

Mid Range 

The Jilda Lance is longer and has the more damaging steel tip and jilda lance has better piece

attack and more flexible weapon

Edge: genghis khan

Close Range 

The Jian more adapt weapon being able to slash, thrust and cut whereas the Turko-Mongol Sabre was primarily a cut and stab weapon. With that being said however, the Sabre is made of steel as opposed to iron making it more durable, more deadly and overall just better quality.

Edge: Genghis Khan 

Special Weapon

mace has much better range and can do much  heavy damage

Edge: Genghis Khan 

X Factors 

<p style="font-size:16px;line-height:26px;">Genghis has an average of 73.3 whereas Sun Tzu has an average of 60.

<p style="font-size:16px;line-height:26px;">Edge: Genghis Khan 

<p style="font-size:16px;line-height:26px;">Final Verdict

<p style="font-size:16px;line-height:26px;">genghis khan

<p style="font-size:16px;line-height:26px;">with better archery+better x factor