User blog comment:Wassboss/Deadliest Warrior Rematch: Comanche vs Mongol/@comment-27358240-20181108013208

Kazanshin's "Native Americans and Mongols? My ancestors fucked them both up." edges:

Knives: Knife vs longer knife. Edge: Mongol

Mid range: Ah, good old spear vs sword. I honestly don't see why everyone is saying the lance can't be used on foot, it's a spear. Spear vs sword, when the spear is longer, the advantage usually goes to the spear unless the sword was made specifically to counter pike walls, such as the zweihander, or just has immense power. The turko-mongol saber doesn't have either of these, so the defensive capacity and length of the war lance takes the edge. Edge: Comanche

Long range: If I recall well, the Comanche arrow actually flew faster than the Mongol arrow in DW. As such, I'll probably give the edge in power to the Comanche bow. In terms of range, the immense "range" of the mongol bow likely comes from the different definition of range. The comanche bow's range is the distance at which a hunter can hit a buffalo. The mogol bow's range is the range at which a million archers can his an enemy army and cause massive damage. In a 5-5 like this, the Mongol bow's range likely won't be as good as in massed combat. As such, my edge goes to the power behind the Comanche bow.

Special: The mace sure is devastating, but I honestly think its incredibly overkill. The war hawk, on the other hand, does its job well enough and doesn't have the clumsiness and long recovery time of the mace. You have one weapon which splatters the guy's brain out but leaves you vulnerable, and another which can "only" smash into the guy's skull and perforate his brain and doesn't leave you as vulnerable. I'm going for the war hawk, a tiger will kill you just as easily as an elephant will, but you can escape an elephant easier than you can escape from a tiger. Edge: Comanche

Armor: Armor vs no armor. Eh, a shield is good enough I guess, but mongols would also normally carry shields. Edge: Mongol

Mount: Horse vs Bigger horse. Edge: Comanche

X-Factors: I won't bother writing down everything and simply say Mongol for resons below.

Final verdict: The Comanche seem to have the weapon edges, right? Well, kind of. You see, the key in all of this is that the Mongol will be wearing metal. Metal armor is a huuuuuge advantage, especially against enemies who don't have armor piercing weapons. The only weapons that will be actually very dangerous to the comanche are the war lance and the war hawk to a lesser extent. The Comanche, on the other hand, are vulnerable to all of the Mongol's weapons. Archery being a key factor in this fight, having armor, even light one, is crucial in winning an archery based fight. As such, I give the victory to the Mongol.