User blog comment:Deathblade 100/Rome's deadliest rivals: Spartacus vs Arminius/@comment-422690-20160521171407

So...

Long Range: Framea wins. The two weapons are very similar, but the Framea is actually usable as a close-combat weapon in a pinch. The Pilum, however, is only suitable as a lawn dart due to its design. The iron part of the shaft was made of a softer iron, meaning it bent easily. While this was effective against shields, it also means it has to hit to be effective. Javelins and the like are not very accurate in one-on-one combat, instead being better suited for massed barrages. The Framea gets the edge because its close-quarters capability means that Arminius can actually get a hit in.

Mid Range: Trident and Net wins. The prongs of the trident can trap other weapons, though its light weight means that doing so with the axe will be difficult. The net can be used for that purpose as well, or to entrap Arminius and set him up for a kill.

Close Range: Spatha wins. Well, they're pretty much identical save for length. That extra foot will be useful for added range as well as concentrating the mass on a smaller tip for extra stabby power. Not much to say, Arminius takes this edge.

Special: Sica wins. While the fire-hardened club will be pretty damn devastating no matter where it hits due to Sparticus' lack of armor, the Sica's forward-curving blade is literally designed to get around Arminius' shield. That's giving it the edge here.

Overall: All in all, I'd have to say Arminius takes this. His weapon set is more useful, he has better tactical knowledge, and his has an additional edge in his physical build. It's going to be a close one, but Arminius will take it.