User blog comment:Goddess of Despair/Utter noob's season 4 revealed/@comment-2006360-20130213105947

Hannibal vs. Spartacus: Hannibal has elephants but really they're only best against in army vs. army battles, ballistas have proved that as well. In a one-on-one or a squad vs. squad battle, they're too easy to take down. Besides, Hannibal's most legendary battle, the Battle of Cannae, was fought after he had lost all his elephants. In most of his fights, he rode on a horse anyway, at the head of his cavalry. Spartacus might have somewhat lesser equipment than his enemy but he knows Roman tactics. Edge: Spartacus

Conquistador vs. Musketeer: This is a VERY close battle, both warriors with similar armor, tactics, and weapons, but I imagine the Conquistador will have a matchlock rifle in comparison to the Musketeer's flintlock musket...although both are only good against metal armor at a certain range, when it comes down to stopping power, the flintlock will same the day. Edge: Musketeer\

ALL THE OTHERS I'M NOT VERY SURE ABOUT AND KINDA NOOBISH

Alexander vs. Caesar: Although the Romans did beat the Macedonians, the Macedonian king then was quite poor of a commander. In an insanely close battle (I hope no gastraphetes is involved, Alexander hardly used them at all and in the show he was really overlooked), I think Alexander is a better tactician and is used to fighting against people with better weapons and more numbers than himself. Edge: Alexander