User blog comment:Samurai234/Winged Hussar vs. Rajput Warrior/@comment-1017446-20110730231512

Omnicube1's Cubeliest Edges

Close Range: Both are very much similar since they're both primarily cutting weapons rather than stabbing, but I feel the sabre weighs much lighter which won't make much of a difference. Edge: Even

Mid Range - polearms: You really like to diversify the mid range category. So far my edge goes to the tabar battle axe. It provides that dual option to slash and stab. However, I will change my vote if the Winged Hussar will be mounted. Edge: Rajput

Mid Range - pistols: That pistol shield is just plain awesome. However, in conventional combat, I really don't see it working too its fullest potential. It has a small caliber size compared to the standard flintlock pistol. Overall, the Pole's pistol will deal more damage and will easily carve through the leather and chainmail. Edge: Winged Hussar

Long Range: The crossbow is just more accurate and has more piercing power compared to the chakram will won't do anything to the steel plated armor of the hussar. Edge: Winged Hussar

Long Range - guns: Slight edge over the carbine. It has a larger caliber size that will do more damage overall. If the hussar will be mounted, then it will be even harder for the rajput to make an accurate shot. Edge: Winged Hussar

Special: Another tough decision considering the warhammer does have the length advantage, while the katar packs piercing power. So far it is a draw, unless the winged hussar is mounted. Edge: Even

The Deadliest Warrior: Winged Hussar, with a horse or not the Winged Hussar will take this one. The rajput's weak armor is their downfall. The hussar's steel will easily absorb most blows thrown at them, except for the katar and the Brown Bess. They take this with 560-440 kills. Again, if horses are brought into this fight it will easily be 620-380