User blog comment:Elgb333/Jason Bourne vs Daniel Lamb/@comment-4454770-20140604012254

Not bad for a newbie, so here's a fellow newbie's vote for you.

Melee: Bourne martial arts gives him an edge. If Daniel does get a weapon Bourne can disarm him. But Lamb is no pushover he too is a cqc combatant, but Bourne is in a whole new level. EDGE: Bourne

Pistols: i dont know why someone would say that a walther is lighter. for what i know glock 23 is one of the most compact glock ever made. Its definately way more slimmer and smaller than a walther. EDGE: Lamb

Shotgun: Its that obvious. Mossberg has more shells and is pump action. EDGE: Lamb

Rifle 1: The dissispator has an advatage for reliability, but in firepower, the M16A2 has it in the bag. EDGE: Lamb

Rifle 2: This I am confused. KS II is chambered for .338 Lapua, not 7.63 nato. yet again in the film Supremacy they combined a WA2000 and the precision rifle. And the gun doesn't even have a mag! So i'm giving this to lamb because he's weapon is tried and true.

Winner: Daniel Lamb. Not only does he have the best weapons, he is the better killer than Bourne. Bourne may have the advantage in a fistfight, but when Lamb gets himself in the shadows, its a dangerous position. The guy can literally hide in a small pocket of darkness. Lamb's stealth makes him almost invisible in the dark and undetectable, and if things go south for Lamb, he can just run and hide from Bourne. Sure Bourne has killed many espionage agents in the past, but that is nothing compared to Lamb who killed countless mercenaries and assassins to boot.