User blog comment:Leolab/Policy Changes/@comment-4484220-20120602215206/@comment-4484220-20120603014640

I understand your concern. If someone has no ill intentions but isn't receiving enough votes, then this would prevent said battle from finishing. But I don't think that justifies ending a battle when only one or two (or maybe three) votes have been received. And it's not all too hard to go on chat and ask people to vote, or trade votes with another who currently has a battle up if you have to. If I hadn't asked people to vote on my first battle, it would have only received two votes, which is definitely not enough. I had to go on chat and ask people in order to get them to vote since I wasn't too well-known at the time, let alone the fact that I used a warrior that almost nobody on this wiki knows. But even then, if you publish a thorough blog post, then people should be able to formulate an opinion by looking at the information provided in the blog post.