User blog comment:Pygmy Hippo 2/Attila the Hun vs. Rajput Warrior/@comment-35680048-20180908193225

Tybaltcapulet's " Asian Conquerors" Edges:

Short Range: The Sword of Mars might  been "legendary" but in my opinion the Khanda will be more effective. It may be slightly heavier(and even then that could be a bonus with power) but being 5 inches longer is quite significant. And Damascus steel vs iron? Edge: Rajput

Mid Range: Both weapons in my opinion aren't very good but at least the aara can disarm and harm foes outside of breaking their necks or tripping them. And the being much longer doesn't help it. That 20 feet rope may be lighter but will be harder to operate effectively.Edge: Rajput

Long Range: The Hunnic bow obviously has to win here. Easier to aim, does more damage and has a much longer range. The chakram will only be good at a much shorter range which easily puts it at a disadvantage.Edge: Attila

Speical: I'm going to give this to the katar not only because of its three blades, but it can be used in much more quick manner(boosted by his martial arts) than the Scythian axe. The Axe takes much more dedication in one's swing and while it is longer I don't believe it will be effective against a fast-moving opponent like the Rajput.Edge: Rajput

Unique X-Factor: This one is really even for me. The horse mount and Gatka are great for two different kinds of mobility. The Gatka boosts some of Rajput's already deadly weapons and makes it much easier to use a weapon like the aara. The horse mount for Attila will be execellent for overall mobility to make up for some of his more lackluster weaponry and his bow.Edge: Even

Actual X-factors: This one I would have to give to the Rajput as well due to Physicality and Armor. Both Attila and the Rajput's experience are quite high, fighting off many foreign soldiers. With Physicality the Rajput generally has heavier armor and can still move very quickly and effectively. Attila may move quicker but overall has less strain on his body with lighter armor and weaponry. Speaking of armor, The Rajput easily destroys Attila here with his Coat of 1000 nails and steel shield while Attila is stuck with all leather armor which weapons like the Katar in my opinion could pierce quite easily. And the Leather lamellar covers less of Attila in general, leaving him utterly exposed.Edge: Rajput

Overall: Even though Attila was famous for destroying the Romans in battle he will lose to the Rajput here. Overall his weapons aren't really going to be effective against the Rajput first of all. His Hunnic bow is really the only thing that he has going for him, and once they get up close his sword and axe won't be enough to help him against the Rajput. And as warriors the Rajput is faster,has better armorhas just as good experience and training as Attila, and is in my opinion stonger than him with the aforementioned heavier armor. And I haven't even mentioned his homefield advantage that will make him be much more familiar and at ease with his surrounding and will boost his tactical ability. Winner: Rajput

Rajput: 4000

Attila: 1000