User blog comment:Deathblade 100/The Science of Evil: Taliban vs Khmer Rouge/@comment-25409692-20150608180807

HanSolo69's "America's bains of its existance" Battle Edges

Long: This is a toughie. The PK is the heavier weapon with a heavier round. The RPD is lighter and will most likely be better for a quick moving battle. The question is, then; do I chose power over mobility, or mobility over power? For me, I can't choose one over the other. This one is Even.

Mid Range

Assault Rifles: In the M16 vs. Ak-47 debate, you've got to seperate it into two categories; Vietnam and modern. In modern, the newer M16 and M4 series destroy newer AKs like the AK-74 or the AK-12. This fight, however, is a Vietnam-era one. The Vietnam M16s weren't fit to wipe the AKs ass. The AK-47 takes this.

Pistols: The Tokarev and Makarov are, to me at least, second-class pistols. That being said, which is newer and is more mobile. If you guessed the Makarov PM, you are correct.

Close: They did this is Saddam vs. Pol Pot (The "Combat Knife" was really an AK Bayonet).

Explosive: An RPG versus a grenade? Come on, man. The RPG-7 hands down.

Winner: The Taliban will take this fight. They believe dying will get them to paradise, so they will fight until the very last man if they have to. The Khmer Rouge are OK, but when guerillas face off, the most stubborn pain in the ass will win.