User blog comment:Deathblade 100/The Generals Collide: Genghis Khan vs Sun Tzu/@comment-17814994-20150817044537

Elgb's "Proud to be Asian!!!" EDGES!!!

Long: Although the Choc ku ni is the more state of the art weapon with the faster rate of fire and added poison lethality, it won't do much. Genghis Khan's bow has the longer range and penetration power, not to mention the mobility and shock effect that'll be Hell to those stationary Pekinese ducks. EDGE: Khan

Mid: The Zhua looks intimidating, feels initmidating, and probably smells initimidating, but in this battle it's more of a larger version of a backscratcher. It's effective in taking out shields, but against an armored Mongolian warrior? Not a chance. The zhua's main disadvantage is that it takes up too much energy equivalent of swinging a big axe while offering less damage that the latter. The Jida lance is longer and simple, you stick it straight to someone's center. Game Over. EDGE: Khan

Close: The turko mongol saber all the way. While the straight sword is good when pinpointing unarmored parts, Chine martial arts never focused much on sword piercing. They used the jian largely for slashing which is a bummber to what it was designed to do. The turko saber can slice through more easily, and will definately penetrate Chinese leather armor. EDGE: Khan

Special: Oh we know what a Ge is. Anyone ever seen Mummy 3? Well that's what a ge is (I think). A flanged mace is good, but a Ge is a more precise weapon that can deliver a far lethal blow with its penetration. EDGE: Sun Tzu

Deadliest Warrior?

He conquered China before, and now he's gonna conquer it again. Khan the Conqueror gets this in a landslide. Sun Tzu is a great military tacticain no doubt (even though I myself believe he didn't exist), but he's up against weapons and tactics way ahead of his time. Sun is only an expert in espionage and infantry battles, both of which would be of no use when up against Genghis Khan's sheer cavalry shock of the Mongol horde.