User blog comment:LB&SCR/Call of Duty vs. Medal of Honor Part 1: World at War Battle 1/@comment-3189283-20150907210932

Lets see shall we

Primary 

I'm not really sure how to structure these edges so I'm going to look at the weapons first and then discuss the actual warriors in my final verdict. That being said I'm going to side with the COD guys here. The total combined ammo count across the three weapons is 30 rounds whereas the MOH guys only have 21 rounds. The COD guys also have the advantage of all having rifles as their primary weapon and this allows them to pick off their opponents from further off. Powell and Barnes are armed with rifles as well but Baker lets the side down with his Trench Gun which is only really going to be useful at a very close range, giving the MOH guys less firepower at a range.

Edge: Call of Duty 

Secondary

This edge is much simpler to structure that the last one. As the Sten and the Thompson are used by both sides they can be effectively discounted and this leaves us with a straight comparison between the PPSh-41 and the De Lise Carbine. Once again I've got to say that Baker has let the team down once again as while the PPSh does have a further range than the other weapons this is offset by it's much smaller clip size. The PPSh has, by far, the most ammo of any one the secondary weapons and backs this up by having the second furthest effective range. The De Lise does give Baker the range he lacks with the Trench Gun but it doesn't compare to the effective ranges of the primary weapons and seeing as how all the other secondary weapons are SMG's in mid range it loses out due to it's slower rate of fire and smaller clip size. The PPSH will dominate in a mid range firefight and this gives the edge once again to the COD guys.

Edge: Call of Duty 

Sidearm

TBC