User blog comment:Arrow7000/Batman (Terry McGinnis) vs. Iron man (MCU)/@comment-4919721-20120704103651/@comment-75.196.76.64-20120704224434

1. Terry's armor is light weight and more manuverable and unlike Tony's which is more of a shell. Althrough Tony has more fire power and strengh it is still out-dated weaponry. If Batman's able to outrun Ironman's sensors, he could very well throw a baterang in an important chink in his armor.

2. In terms of endurance I would say Terry has more, because he's just a guy in a suit that does give some protection, but in the long run he is still able to be Batman without the armor. This verson of Ironman still hasn't proved that he can do anything at all without the armor, so in my terms he is still not the Ironman, but he got some training from Happy in the movie, but he still hasn't got the training from Captian America.

3. Batman has had more experience in fighting people more powerful than he is, so Ironman's just another chump in a suit with super strength. Terry could at least for a while slow him down if he crashed the Batplane in to him.

I acctualy really like both Batman and Ironman alot.