User blog comment:Astrotorical/Blog of News: Masterchief vs. Wiki Grief/@comment-4098900-20120210013019

I have some idea's here rather then doing a poll on weather we should perma ban temp ban or not ban or regulate the chief at all why not just do this I think most of us will agree on it. Actually I have a few idea's. The first one is this we every battle with the Chief is closely watched and if anyone even comes close to flaming or starts raging the fight is deleted. Another one is this 5-10 users volunteer to do a fight with the chief and after all of those fights have been done, admins evaluate how things went and what path they should go down with this. By doing that users who had really good fights with him can get it out and fights like IM Vs MC in which like 6 users demand to be done can get it done. The other idea is this since so many users are pist about how specific fights with him turned out (MC Vs SA MC Vs IM) we delete all the past fights with the chief then don't regulate things and start all over again start fresh. Then we see what happens on the next few chief fights. I think that a lot of the anti chief votes and how strong some users feel about making the chief loose weather they are bias or not comes from the previous fights that he won that he never should have, or that was just won by bias sock puppets or whatever. I think that would be the best way to eliminate bias and to not regulate this way everyone is happy