Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-422690-20160511194341/@comment-422690-20160512162256

I'll put forth a nomination for EA. He's matured a lot, has experience, and knows policy. Furthermore, he has shown a willingness to listen and discuss rather than simply trying to force his interpretation of policy on others.

I'll second Beast; he's shown the same, though his activity level leaves a little to be desired.

I'm actually going to recommend against Appel, mostly due to that last point in EA's favor. Appel, while having zeal for policy and editing, tends only to make minor edits, as well as being quick to start edit wars rather than taking to chat to discuss conflicts. Further, he has also shown an unwillingness to listen to admins as a user, which does not bode well for him listening to users as an admin. Appel has potential, but he still needs to mature before he holds a position of power.