User blog comment:The Deadliest Warrior/Grammar and Spelling/@comment-75.105.33.149-20110211050844/@comment-422690-20110212023711

"I don't want to attack anyone" That's exactly what you're doing, even if it was unintentional. Now to address what seems to be the mainp points of your argument:

Sure, some people don't do too much research or just post a link, but others of us go through source material. I've re-read a full trilogy to find the weapons for Gerald Tarrant. And attacking the results is not too valid of a criticism. The results of the battle here is decided by the opinion of the other users on this wiki, which lends itself to irrational results, especially in the earlier matches like your example (IIRC, the Buu vs The Mask was the third or so match-up here and the first "God" match). Furthermore, your criticisms show a slight misunderstanding of how the battles work. Users pit two warriors against each other in a style of their choosing. Most tend to pattern it after the fromat of Deadliest Warrior, with a close, mid, long, and special weapon. It's not required, but most do so.

While many areas need work, you simply are criticising some of the wrong ones. With the exceptipon of the "The Coach" thing, all of your criticisms were directed at the results of the match, which is as I said are not the most accurate since it's based off of the opinion of other users and can be influenced by Anon spam. This is a fun wiki, not an overly-serious one.

I was honestly ready to dismiss you as a troll if it werent for your second reply. And none of us attach the word "expert" to our name. Not even Swg66, and he f-- deserves it.