User blog comment:Alockwood1/Sir Daniel Fortesque Versus The Scotsman/@comment-17814994-20160324063000

Elgb's "Oh Man. I Hope This Goes Well Better Than The Last Jack vs Daniel Fight" EDGES!!!

Unarmed: Sir Daniel's arm may have the adantage in ragne, but it's doubtful if it can actually harm the Scotman. This is a guy here who can lift a tank and take more powerful bludgeons, so a weak boomerang hand won't do squat. Then, there's also Scotsman supereme close-quarters combat and strength that would wreck Daniel up close. EDGE: Scotsman

Main: Both weapons are absurd blades capable of slicing through anything their universe has. But Sir Daniel is carrying also an equally-magical shield. So yeah, two eapons beat one. EDGE: Sir Daniel

Long: I can't be too sure. The Gatling gun is definately the easier to use weapon that Sir Daniel can use with cover, while the leg machine gun the Scotsman is carrying is not only innacurate but also leaves him in the open (to the point that the Scotsman literally has to pay and spray to effectively use it). But Scotty's machine gun has more firepwoer and rate of fire than the old gatling gun. It's automatic too. So it's a tough one and I'll give both the edge. EDGE: Even

Explosive: The grenade easily. The bombs Sir Daniel uses are old-fashioned and is harder and more dangerous to use. The grenade is safer and can be thrown farther. It may have also the larger damage and has less faults. EDGE: Scotsman

Special: The bagpipes easily. While Sir Daniel's undead physiology lacks ears and is certainly robust, the bagpipes have shown to be capable of affecting magical nature, so Sir Daniel has no escape. EDGE: Scotsman

Deadliest Warrior?

It's gotta be a tough one but the Scotsman has this. Not only is he carrying the better and mroe powerful physicality and weapons, but he's also- truth to be told- smarter and more brutal. Also, God knows how much the Scotsman's magical runes and swords would do against Sir Daniel's undead physiology.