User blog comment:3shady/Viet Cong VS Afghan Mujahideen/@comment-6389069-20141007112004

Short Range As you said, the bayonet is at a disadvantage because not only is it smaller than the sabre bit it is also fixed to the rifle. The sabre is bigger, designed for slixing and will probably be taken as more intimidating. Edge - Mujahideen.

Mid range This one is close because the AKM and the Type-56 are almost identical weapons. However the Type-56 was copied from the AK47, the predecessor of the AKM. The AKM is an updated design and, being manufactured by the original designers, is manufactured at a higher quality. Edge - Mujahideen.

Long range This is also close because the Mosin-Nagant and Lee Enfield were both designed at almost the same time to fulfill very similar roles. I would have therefore given the edge to the Lee Enfield because of its ten round magazine. However as you said the Lee Enfields used by the Mujahideen were dangerous to use due to their incredibly poor quality. For that reason the Mosin-Nagant will be a safer and more practical weapon for the battle. Edge - Viet Cong

"Special weapons' While the RPG seems like the obvious choice, I put this edge as even. The RPG could instantly destroy most targets within about 300 feet, it could only fire one rocket at a time. The flamethrower has a range of about 150 feet and can inflict horrific burn injuries. Edge - Even.

X-Factors The Mijahideen were more devoted to their goal and could fight for longer. The only X-factor that the Viet Cong have that could alter the outcome is dicipline, as disease immunity won't be a big factor in a single battle. Edge - Mujadiheen.

The Mujahideen are the deadliest warrior of this battle and will emerge victorious.

Also if you have any interest in video games please vote on my latest battle James Heller vs. Delsin Rowe.