Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-35680048-20190709024433

The Rajput is again taking metallurgy with his steel weaponry/armor vs the Comanche's iron weaponry. And this time, unlike the Celt, there is no claiming he had any sort of armor, not even mail. He totally relies on his Sure the Comanche has an actual ranged weapon, but the type they had was a self-bow, which really lacks the power and range of something like say a Mongol Recurve bow. And the Comanche still has to get through the Rajput's Steel shield and armor. And in close range, forget about it. The Comache will get melted by the Katar and Khanda. Some may say "Tybalt, what about the fact that Comanches are horsemen? You forget about that? It'll be harder for the Rajput to fight them." To that I would say do you really believe that Rajputs haven't fought against armies with skilled horsemen before? Like I don't know the freaking Mughals? Who also had skilled cavalry,with superior armor, and also had lances, swords, and even sometimes guns.

This battle is not only a battle with little quality (Being a 2011 battle, so even if its deemed fair it would deserve a rematch), the Comanche has no feasible way of defeating the Rajput. (Though it was funny seeing Leo justifying the aara being superior against a literal lance because the Comanche is lightly armored:) ) 