User:HaydenStudios/Sandbox

Expert's Opinion debate
If you are viewing this, Arrow, Leo, or anyone else, please wait for me to make the next comment on the discussion on Russian Mafia. My full reply is on it's way. Please be patient. This notice here will be removed when I have posted that comment. If I have posted that comment of reply linking to this, and have not removed this notice, then someone please notify me.

This discussion took place on May 19, 2012

11:10 Arrow7000: Reposting this real fast -Also, it has apparently been decided that experts opinons are not to be changed (by omni) So what about battles without them? have any admins (more now yay) come to a consensous oon that?

11:11 Leolab: @Arrow: There hasn't been a discussion that I'm aware of.

11:11 Arrow7000: Omni mentioned it in reply to hayden

...

11:13 HaydenStudios: So omni told me that expert's opinions shouldn't be edited by just any user, whereas both me and Drayco, now both admins, think that they should be open to editing.

11:15 Arrow7000: I propse the following, Existing Expert's opinions should not be edited without author consent, but battles without them can have them added if the author (if active) agrees on the wording

11:16 Drayco90: ^^^^^^^^^^ I could get behind that.

11:16 Leolab: ^

11:16 HaydenStudios: I, personally, think that any expert's opinion should be open to both creating or editing by any user, provided that it isn't vandalism.

11:16 Arrow7000: Which Drayco? mine?

11:16 Drayco90: Yours (too many arrows, I know)

11:16 Lasmoore: No, hayden. That's stupid.

11:16 HaydenStudios: Why do you believe so?

11:16 Arrow7000: lol way to be blunt Las lol

11:16 Codgod13: hayden why would that happen its stupid totally agree with las anyone can edit anyones thing

11:17 Lasmoore: It'd be fucking stupid

11:17 Codgod13: ^^^^^^

11:17 Leolab: @Hayden: It's a bad idea. Besides, Omni shot that down.

11:17 Arrow7000: I think, while they are often dumb, they are part of the battle, just like Aftermath sections

11:17 Drayco90: Honestly? I agree with HS. Some Expert's Opinions are no more than a sentence. I mean, it has to follow the reasoning of the voters, but I don't think things like "Chief wins because his better armor and weapons" alone should be left like that. I like Arrow's compromise.

11:17 Codgod13: i know but its just too trollable

11:18 Leolab: ^

11:18 Lasmoore: Omni shot it down, I don't agree, Users don't agree, fuck it

11:18 Codgod13: i think they can vote for it in the comments for it to be longer that would be easier

11:18 Arrow7000: So "Existing Expert's opinions should not be edited without author consent, but battles without them can have them added if the author (if active) agrees on the wording" Do you guys like this basic plan? any other objections or ideas?

11:18 Drayco90: ^ I second that.

11:18 Leolab: I third it.

11:19 Drayco90: What about inactive users?

11:19 HaydenStudios: ^

11:19 Codgod13: fourth it

11:19 Richard Starkey: i OVER 9,000! That

11:19 Arrow7000: Also, I can't wait till Hawk edits one of Hayden's and he sqitches sides

* swithces

Maybe innactive user opinions just need admin or three user consent?

11:20 Codgod13: gtg peace

11:20 HaydenStudios: K, bye.

11:20 Arrow7000: bye cod

11:20 Codgod13: FINAL SPAM KAMAIKAZE!!!!

11:20 Drayco90: See y a cod.

11:20 Codgod13: User_blog:Codgod13/Zelda_henchman_battle:_Ghirahim_vs_Zant

'''~ Codgod13 has left the chat. ~ 11:20 Arrow7000:''' lol What do you guys think about that solution?

11:21 Leolab: I'm cool.

11:21 Drayco90: ^

11:21 HaydenStudios: Alright. Just one more thing. What will we do about expert's opinions for battles that are being or have been redone? Do we just leave the old expert's opinions there even if it's BS?

11:22 Leolab: Leave it

11:22 Arrow7000: Also for the Lawlz -http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/12131286

11:22 HaydenStudios: Ok.

11:22 Drayco90: They're the voter's opinions they should be left.

11:22 HaydenStudios: Oh, one more thing.

11:22 Leolab: It's for completeness, Hayden.

11:22 Arrow7000: Any objections to experts opinons can be brought up on the talk page Which we should totally start using for the records and whatnot

11:23 HaydenStudios: Should users be allowed to make spelling and grammar corrections on expert's opinions?

11:23 MrPacheco101: I told hayden that eariler

11:23 Drayco90: No, just like battles.

11:23 Leolab: @Hayden: again, with th eauthor's permission.

* the author's

11:23 HaydenStudios: Ok.

11:23 Arrow7000: No, what's written by the author is written by hte author (my own opinion) unless like Leo says the Author gives constent

I was ninja'd

11:24 Drayco90: You always are.

11:24 HaydenStudios: Haha.

11:24 Leolab: Is there a (ninja) emote? Yes there is!