User blog comment:Cfp3157/Suleiman the Magnificent vs. Cesare of Borgia/@comment-24796936-20140819203143

Here's my vote

Sword 1: you said the yataghan is primarily built for slashing, which means it could be used to stab, just not primarily. The rapier is longer though so I'm going to call this even as the more uses the yatanhan can provide cancels out the superior length of the rapier.

EDGE: even

Sword 2: both of these swords seem pretty even, there both around 3 feet and can be used to stab and slash, by looking at the falchion it looks like it can stab and slash as well. So I'm calling this once again even.

EDGE: even

Heavy melee: both of these weapons do blunt force trauma, but I will give this to the Italian warhammer because it has a spike which adds to the uses of the war hammer.

EDGE: Italian warhammer

Polearm: while the ottoman halberd can slash, stab, and hook, the pike is two times longer than it. The range of the pike will defiantly keep anything at bay.

EDGE: pike

Bow: the arbalest crossbow seems to have greater range, but it takes way more time to load it. The recurve bow on the other hand downer take long to shoot another arrow and is way easier to use, and it looks lighter to.

EDGE: recurve bow

Firearm: both of these firearms seem pretty even, so I'm calling it dead even.

EDGE: even

Winner: I think Ceasare Borgia got this. While Suleiman seemed to have done more accomplishments than Ceasare, Caesars has gotten way more edges to his weapons. This will be a close fight, but I say Ceasare Borgia will win.

WINNER: Ceasare Borgia