User blog comment:Deathblade 100/Rome's Greatest Rivals Collide: Hannibal vs Attila the Hun/@comment-26228289-20150730173711

Long Range: Composite bow takes due to far superior range, fire rate, more accuracy, takes less energy, and because the Soliferrum is only a one-shot weapon while the Composite bow boasts multiple arrows for extra chances. EDGE: Atilla

Mid Range: While the Sarissa has a ridiculous range advantage, at the same time it's also its own disadvantage. As the weight and length of the Sarissa causes it to be quite difficult to wield and can be easily avoidable. On the other hand we got the Scythian Axe which is easily more versatile and swift to wield and could just slice the Sarissa in half or get ahold of it. EDGE: Atilla

Close Range: Sword of Mars takes for having a reach advantage, double-edge, made of possibly tougher material, and can be wielded just as easily. EDGE: Atilla

Special: Wow, this is sort of funny comparing a lasso to War Elephant... Anyways, the War elephant takes due to being more versatile, far more intimidating, very physically tough, and can keep Hannibal out of reach from the lasso despite the War elephant having to be prone to panic at times. EDGE: Hannibal

Armor: Of course the Musculata which is constructed of steel, bronze, and wood boast greater resistance than the leather armor, although the leather armor is much lighter. However in this case, it's all about the superior protection. EDGE: Hannibal

Final Verdict: Atilla the Hun

Atilla has won this one for dominating Hannibal in every category except Special and Armor, but no matter as Atilla can utilize his bow to cause a panic attack for the War elephant and either blind it, incapacitate it from enough damage, or cause it to flee. Plus Atilla possesses more options in close combat to where he could also utilize his lasso and a far more versatile Scythian Axe and the more advantageous Sword of Mars. Then Atilla would dominate Hannibal in long range combat.