User blog comment:Elgb333/Bear Grylls vs Joel Lambert/@comment-4844014-20140531192825

What a shame. This blog battle is beautiful - it has been well made and had clear effort put into it.

But.

I can't deny that I've got strong doubts about this actually being a legitimate battle, primarily because of it's warriors. I might be wrong, I probably am, but I am pretty sure Bear Grylls can not be considered an actual warrior. While respectfully he has served in the army and SAS, the premise of this battle being about Navy SEALs vs. SAS is slightly contradicted by the fact that Bear hasn't necessarily seen combat. While he was in the SAS, Bear was in the reserves of 21, not the actual combat focused 21. That does slightly contradict the battle policy on this wiki as in the warriors section, as we have to consider that Bear doesn't actually fight for a living or on a daily basis. He only served with few for 2/3 years and as a reserve, it is strong for one to argue that Bear probably didn't see any combat.

These are just my thoughts anyway, and I probably am wrong because I can't recall his service history from any of his biographies but we'll see when an admin notices this on wiki activity.