User blog comment:Leolab/Retroactive Unfair Battle Enforcement/@comment-6771148-20130506040205/@comment-4484220-20130506214022

In some extreme cases, improperly listing or ignoring powers, abilities, and common weapons wielded by one or more of the warriors in a fight can be grounds for altogether removing due to unfairness, rather than rematching.

If certain powers are not taken into account in a fight, then the lack thereof may be a fair fight. But if one were to redo that fight and take into account all of the warriors' powers, then there are cases in which it would be unfair. Recall that in Master Chief vs. Albus Dumbledore, Master Chief won not only because of overwhelming Chief bias, but also because only few of Dumbledore's powers were taken into account in the blog post. A while later, the bad representation was exploited, and it was agreed that in a properly represented battle, not only would Dumbledore have won, but also that he is superior to the point of it being unfair. Hence, why it was removed.

Of course, there are battles that, while poorly represented, are much more suited for rematching, rather than removing (such as Uruk-Hai vs. Apes, Predator vs. V, etc.), but this is not one of them.