Board Thread:Officer's Pub (Staff Only, idiots)/@comment-422690-20160522213838/@comment-4661256-20160523165523

Leolab wrote: Wanting headers is fine and all, but how do you propose to enforce it? Giving a warning won't stop them from being lazy, and giving even a short temp ban is overly harsh for that kind of thing.

Okay, I thought about it some more and I have an idea. All battles in the infobox without a corresponding header on the page will be removed. That's it--no user punishment, no warning or anything needed. It's not even nullifying the battle. It's just a way to make the users take initiative--if they want their infobox "will fight whoever" status to be valid, then they have to do the subsequent header.

And, of course, if they have their infobox status removed as a result of not following article policy, they are encouraged to go in and re-add it, along with the corresponding header. I think my proposal is reasonable and promises to be effective. Thoughts?