User blog comment:Cfp3157/Percy Jackson vs. Harry Potter/@comment-24180428-20131103003408/@comment-24180428-20131103230107

" That helps prove my point, not yours. If Harry imperio'd Blackjack into fighting Percy, Percy would be too horrified to fight back and would have the ever-loving crap beaten out of him."

My point was that Percy wouldn't need to because of his father. "Except, y'know, for the part where Percy has no divine intervention to help him in this fight."

Not stated on the blog.

"And I guess Cfp is misrepresenting Harry quite poorly here."

I noticed. I got /all/ my information from the blog which is probably why most of it's wrong.