User blog comment:3shady/Viet Cong VS Afghan Mujahideen/@comment-4476906-20141008215514

Urban EDGES

Close: While the Saber has range, the Bayonet is easily used, for it is at the barrel of your gun. Unfortunatly, It's awkward to use, and by the time you can awkwarly thrust your spike-on-a-gun at your enemy, they'll have turned you into filet mignon.

EDGE: Mujahdeen

Mid: The AKM and Type-56 have rather similar builds, but that's only because the Type-56 is a knock off of the AK family.

EDGE: Mujahdeen (Because filthy, filthy plagiarism)

Long: The Lee-Enfield that the Mujadeen use are poorly manufactured by pretty much untrained people. They're prone to explode and break upon firing. The Soviets used the Mosin Nagant because they were strong (like bull), powerful, and could be easily fitted with a scope. While the Viet Cong could easily forged their own Mosin Nagants, they are actually genuine (Don't quote me on that).

EDGE: Viet Cong

Special: First, an interesting fact: Only about 50 soldiers used flamethrowers in WW2. NOW TO THE EDGES. The reason flamethroweres aren't widespread is because they have a very short range, are awkwardly heavy, and they could backfire, causing bad reprocussions. Like death. RPGs are difficult to hold, and are heavy, BUT, they are damn well effective.

EDGE: Mujahdeen

Overall: Mujahdeen. While both are untrained, guerilla combatants, the Mujahdeen have somewhat better weapons. The only other thing that saves them from a tie is their critical devotion.

WINNER: Mujahdeen!