User blog comment:Pygmy Hippo 2/Attila the Hun vs. Rajput Warrior/@comment-36053634-20180910091154

Guitarcar's "KHAAA- no wait" edges

Short range:

Neon: EaSy EdgE tO AtIIla, IT FiRes LaZErs!!!

I'll agree with Tybalt. The Rajput's sword will deal heavier blows and paired with a slightly longer range and better steel will give the Rajput and edge over a.......Martian sword?

Edge: Rajput

Mid range:

The Aara can atleast kill or injure a guy. Besides, the Rajput has a bladed weapon so he could just cut the lasso as soon as it attaches.

Edge: Rajput

Long range:

A bow vs a sharp disk? The bows of mongolia (Or the entire east) are famous for its accuracy even while on horseback. Its pretty easy to see how a sharp disk loses here.

Major edge: Attila the hun

Special weapon:

Tybalt has some good edges but I dont think so the claw like weapon is really that effective with martial arts. Dont get me wrong, Martial arts are handy but multiple experienced street fighters like some who challenged the Russian Systema said that martial art moves could only be used in a scenario that suits the user and must not be relied on. The Axe by far looks practical to me by far.

Slight edge: Atilla le hun

Unique X-Factors: Giving this to the Indian warrior. A horse does not bode so well in an Indian jungle and will see itself easily trapped in the greenery. Major edge: Rajput

X-Factors:

Huns were notoriously skinny and so they were probally less stronger than their enemies which is why they kept their distance. The Rajputs armor and homefield advantage will give them this edge here  Edge: Rajput warrior

Sumarry:

The better close range weaponry the Rajput brought along with their homefield advantage will outclass the bow and pretty much nullifiy Atilla's long range advantage thus giving them the win.

Winner: Rajput warriors