Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-5078776-20161007134421/@comment-3189283-20161007174820

For my first nomination, I am going to throw Appel's name into the hat. If adminship was purely on a activity level then Appel would be a prime candidate, he's on here almost daily, makes plenty of edits and was the only non-admin user to be involved in DEATH BY EDIT. He's an editing machine but is also good at easing in new users and dispensing advice. However this love of editing also comes with the downside that he focuses too much on that aspect sometimes and as a result has been banned several times for minor editing which is kind of a stain against his name. Still I'm putting his name forward.

For my second nomination I'd like to put forward an almost opposite candidate to  Appel; Beast. Beast has been up for adminship in every admin election since he joined the wiki and it's easy to see why, he's a frequent collaborator, has good standing with other users and knows rules and policy inside out due to how long he's been here. However his activity level is lacking considerably and that's been a major problem with previous admins which is a strike against his name. But like Appel I'm still putting his name forward.

Ideally we should splice Appel's editing genetics with Beast's seniority and clean ban record genetics to make the perfect admin candidate.