Board Thread:Officer's Pub (Staff Only, idiots)/@comment-27334870-20180228190850/@comment-5078776-20180228200329

Here's on this is done, kiddos.

A) While not the best option, it is the second best. If we are going to force the real life people into their status as a warrior, then we must follow an all-or-none principle. With the real people taken into account, it becomes painfully clear that these characters would not meet the proper criteria for being warriors.

B) This is such a niche category of warrior it is not worth truly considering.

C) The moment we merge reality and fiction, these characters are no longer the characters themselves. Once they are merged, the real life counterpart ends up violating the policy for creating a warrior.

D) This is the only valid option- these characters and personas are fiction and shall be treated as such. The real life personality having actual fighting experience is too much a niche to consider adding into policy. This is the primary reason we can have a majority of our film warriors; Robert de Niro is not Travis Bickle, Christian Bale is not Batman, and Mark Calaway is not The Undertaker.