Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-35680048-20190531133723

Come on this isn't even close to fair. It's very clear that this was intended as the WW2 versions of these two. At this point, Patton had a hell of a lot more experience than Hitler, who even in his prime wasn't on Patton's level.

Patton is easily the better trained, more calm, logistically and mentally sound, and more experienced commander in every way. I'm not sure if Affectos planned on giving them men to command( I mean he better have, with all the differing types of weapons here), but that would put it all into Patton's hands immediately anyways. And even if it was a 1v1, with Hitler's overall mental instability would make it very hard to really fight against someone like Patton.

And even worse than that, Affectos himself admitted in the blog itself that this isn't a fair battle. Here's his direct quote

"I admit that using Hitler was a horrible idea for Patton's foe was a really bad idea. I made this one when I first began makeing match-ups, but wasn't the best a even and fair matches. Even my friends said I should've changed it to Rommel, but I was an idiot. I apologize to all who vote."

Massive disparity in every important X-factor category, and even the author believes it to be an unfair battle. I think this one's pretty clearcut. 