Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-5078776-20161007134421/@comment-5078776-20161008023143

I will nominate two candidates, but shall also play Devil's Advocate to both;

I shall be perfectly honest- neither user is an ideal candidate. However, they are both the best options we have.
 * Beast: Beast is fairly competent as a nominee- he understands both the formal policies of our wiki and the necessary digression needed to address every situation. The biggest problem with Beast, naturally, is his activity level- he's very rarely on the wiki. This not only prevents him from performing his duties as admin, but leaves a very possible threat of what is essentially an empty position. Should we have need for an issue to be addressed by the entirety of staff, Beast's inability to consistently give input will make processes very difficult.
 * Appel: Appel is a very hard worker, launching a vicious campaign in rebuilding our wiki into a proper condition. He can and will enforce policy- but he will do so blindly. However, Appel has also been the root cause of several policy changes, as well as inciting several altercations with other users (both normal and staff). He's been banned multiple times, all of them warranted, whether due to misbehavior in chat or meticulous nitpicking.