Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-11361577-20160801143105/@comment-5795750-20160801214820

What about Marston vs Scaletta and Marston vs Phelps and that 3rd Person Free-for-all featuring Marston, Devlin, Scaletta, Drake and Phelps?

Also I am going to go on this since as Cfp states and as I see on the battle comments, there can be arguments made for Marston which are (as I best describe it) not wrong

And this might be a bit "apples-to-oranges" but I can think of another battle in which one side is far superior to the other side in terms of technology and yet an argument can be made for the inferior tech side and that is Blood Gulch Squads vs RED Team - Halo tech far surpasses that of TF2 tech (especially with regards to armour) but the respectable Drayco90 (among some others) argued for RED Team due to some X-Factors on that team balancing the whole battle dynamic. Again I redirect you to the arguments made by the Marston supporters that aren't wrong - those votes followed a similar line of logic ("Yes Niko has the more tech advanced weapons but...") and as far as i can see, no-one has made a rebuttal against them. I would like to include the ancient/medieval tourney here since that contains acouple of matches pitting a Roman-era warrior against medieval opponents (a tech gap much wider than Marston to Niko) but due to mitigating circumstances I am not going to do that.

So unless you can provide a good rebuttal against all three arguments for Marston, I'm sticking with neutral for now. I agree though with this battle being remade into something better.