User blog comment:Omnicube1/Concerning....Many Things/@comment-4484220-20120110145627/@comment-4484220-20120110173841

One user's opinion of a warrior's training may differ from another's. If two warriors are mostly even in terms of weapons, and their training is mostly the same, other X-factors might be ignored by the author. What if one of them has less training, but much more strength, agility, and vitality, while the other has more training, but less of everything else? What if the one with much less of the X-factors commonly fanboyed, and he wins, then an admin forbids a re-match, then how is that fair?