User blog comment:Alockwood1/Sir Daniel Fortesque Versus The Scotsman/@comment-5078776-20160409163259

I'LL SHOW YOU!!! Dan losing his arm places him at a severe disadvantage fighting. The Scot's brute strength, meanwhile, is more than enough to put Dan pack into a pile of bones once he gets a solid hit. While the magic claymore is certainly a deadly weapon, it's naturally a slow and bulky weapon, even in the Scot's hands. Sir Dan's sword-and-shield combo, however, gives him a much needed defensive and offensive edge. He's much lighter on his feet without having too much of a reach, so he can easily manuever outside the Scot's range and get close for a killing blow. While the Scot's machinegun as a whole is better, what people are forgetting is the fact that it's his leg; throughout the battle, he's gonna be inhibited by the fact his leg is a gun. Dan's Gatling Gun is much more powerful, but it lacks the rate of fire or accuracy of the Scot's machinegun leg. Both items go boom. Ultimately, neither of these factors is gonna be a gigantic factor. That being said, the Scot using his bagpipes requires that he lose both hands. Sir Dan being undead js just natural. Despite Alock's quite obviously biased presentation of the Scotsman compared to Sir Dan, the undead knight still wins either way. For one, he actually has better experience- despite not doing much alive, he's fought far more difficult and varied opponents then the Scot has been shown to fight. He's also better equiped all around; his sword and shield is significantly better balanced then the Scot's claymore, and he, quite surprisingly, the more mobile of the two warriors. Finallly, he's wearing plate armor. Combined with his undead nature, Sir Daniel Fortesque can easily take more damage and dish it out just as easily, making this an easy win.
 * Unarmed: The Scotsman
 * Sword: Sir Daniel Fortesque
 * Machine Gun: Even
 * Explosive: Even
 * The Useless Category: Sir Dan
 * WINNER: Sir Daniel Fortesque