User blog comment:Tybaltcapulet/Juramentado vs. Zulu/@comment-35680048-20180814155915/@comment-11361577-20180814163858

I appreciate you trying to be strict about voting rules (after all if we didn't we would get the one sentence votes we would get in the early days of the wiki), however, I feel like you're being a bit too strict about the X-Factors.

If someone (and this is my opinion) can give an accurate summarization in the end on why they think a warrior wins which is consistent with the data presented in the blog then it shouldn't matter whether or they covered the X-Factors in their edges. Another problem I have is that there is no point on voting on the edges since you already did it for us in the blog by giving the X-Factors scores and saying that one warrior has better training, is more brutal, ect.. And I know most people on this wiki do this, but they don't force people to use edges on X-Factors.

Another thing that is rather inconsistent and Wass brought to my attention is that a vote with seven sentences which doesn't need to cover X-Factors does count but a vote that covers edges doesn't.

Sorry for the small rant, but I think you really need to change the way you do things with your voting rules.