User blog comment:LB&SCR/Well, that went well: George Custer vs. Frederic Thesiger/@comment-26032472-20160221101553

MilenHD's"They are both at the red,white and blue side"edges

Short:Edge Custer:Both are sbaers,both can hack,slash and stab,but the 1860 is longer and since was widely popular of this time,it was also more sharper which means it can kill by one hit.

Mid:Edge Even:I was going all the way with the Colt Single Action Army,while it is the greatest revolver ever,it has his weaknesses,with slower rate of fire,but Greater accuracy might beat the Beaumont-adams,but still the Brits of this time period were better trained with firearms,plus it has faster rate of fire and that means that he can kill much faster but with less accuracy.For me this is even.

Long:Edge Thesiger:While the Trapdoor Springfield has faster rate of fire and has bigger muzzle velocity,the Martine-Henry has more range and much more killing power.While I disagree at most parts with Elgb,the Trapdoor Carbine is more advanced but Thesiger's troops are more disciplined and can use their rifle with precision.

Winner:Frederic Thesiger:Both of them lost and failed,but Thesiger survived and manafed to return stronger and more vicious,thristy for revenge.Anyway Thesiger's long range advantage and better discipline will help him seal the victory for himself.Yeah Custer's fail at Little Bighorn not only cost him his glory,but cost him his life.While Thesiger survived and died much later.