User blog comment:Cfp3157/Galahad vs. Batman/@comment-26384220-20151210040234/@comment-4661256-20151210182803

I really feel like you didn't give Batman nearly enough credit here. Your equipment evaluation did not even mention things like the EMP gun, explosive gel gun, or pneumatic wrangler... you just said "Batman has more equipment." I don't think you have evaluated all of his equipment in enough detail for that to be valid.

You also said, "if this was a stealth fight... but, 'tis not." Says who? Batman is an expert at stealth and I'm sure in a fight he'll try to play to his advantages. The "more equipment" that you glossed over includes a grapple gun and smoke pellets, both of which will give Batman enviornmental dominance and enable him to make great use of his stealth. You also ignored the fact that Batman is fighting in his home turf while Galahad is fighting on unfamiliar grounds, which will also be a huge factor.

Finally (and this is certainly the point I have the most issue with), you say "an experienced fighter will always beat an inexperienced fighter and that will cost Batman a win here." Your entire vote is based on the absolutely false premise that Batman is inexperienced. Like... what? Batman has tons of combat experience against a wide variety of foes. I don't mind if you vote for Galahad but I'd be upset if he wins as a result of faulty logic like that present here.