User blog comment:Cfp3157/Galahad vs. Batman/@comment-4698460-20151210015618/@comment-4698460-20151211224251

I've never really counted number of films as part of experience: If that was true then guys like James Bond, Superman, and everyone else whose been in a coupe metric tons of movies would absolutely cream anyone they came up against.

"You seem to forget that the Joker planted a cellphone bomb in a prisoner's stomach." It's not called forgetting when you never knew in the first place. Batman isn't a superhero that I follow their every single breathing moment. My knowledge of Batman is severely limited to what I knew beforehand (not a lot) and to what Cfp has provided (still not a lot). The only reason I even know of the Kingsman' s enemies using chip explosives in the head is when the Kingsman detonate all of them, make like every single person in the secret base's head explode in a puff of pink mist.

Again, I don't know a lot, so I had to go and talk out my problems in chat. These guys offered me a hand do to the fact Batman Knowledge is limited. Beast says that Batman could barely beat his big threats: That Rachel tazes the Scarecrow and that if it wasn't for Catwoman, Bane would of killed him. He also said that Top-shape Batman could barely take down the Joker. Galahad is no Joker; he's a trained agent in many forms of ranged and hand-to-hand combat.

Err... Yes, again with the terrain familiarity edge. Yes, I'll say again (as many times as needed) I did not factor that in. Other new info brought to light: Batman's tactics, according to Beast: hide, pop-out, attack, profit. Not so handy against an trained combatant. Also, Wander filled me in that when Batman has the tactical advantage, he tends to ruin it.

I've spoken again... back to the Butcher novel!