User blog comment:El Alamein/Lewis and Clark vs. Paul Revere/@comment-2149911-20121002042106

I have to go with Lewis and Clark, to me they seem to be the better soldier out the two warriors. They have the better weaponswhen it comes to long range and mid range since it has a much better accuracy than the brown bess and pensylvania rifle. Their pipe tomahawks are alot more practical and useful in a squad on squad fight than an actual cannon where it only gets one shot and takes a long time to reload, giving the duo the chance to hake their foe up to bits. They also seem to be the better trained out of the two, having prior military training beforehand and fighting off whatever native americans or wild beast that was in the Lousiana Purchase. Paul was first and foremost a better engineer due to his skills in silversmithing and during the war he mostly did engineer war, battle wise he's just not on par like Lewis and or Clark. Overall I give this to Lewis and Clark.