User blog comment:KevlarNinja/Highlander vs. Comanche/@comment-3166030-20110228213558

The Comanche will have this one. I present SLAYER'S SUPPORTING STATEMENT...

Short Range: The Warhammer is an effective anti-armor weapon, however, it's up against a quick and nimble armorless Indian, who is fighting via horseback, with a much lighter and efficient axe. The edge in Short range goes to the Comanche.

Mid-Range: The Claymore would make mince-meat out of the Comanche.... IF he can get within the bow's range, and take him off his horse. Both of which seems rather difficult, and more likely than not, he will wear himself out swinging that huge thing. The War Lance will also easily pierce the light chainmail that the Highlander would be wearing. Edge: Comanche

Long Range: Okay, the bow is 250 meters, and lethally accurate. The Ball and Chain is much less, and has no accuracy at all. The only use would be to break a horse's leg. Edge: Comanche

Special Weapons: Okay, so the ball and chain isn't useful... just like the Scalping knife. The only use it'll have, is after the Comanche wins his fight. The Targe and Dirk is a very well done offensive/defensive combo, which can pose quite a threat. Edge: Highlander

Hypothesis: The Comanche, while unarmored, will take this fight, due to greater mobility. The kill tally will be around 620-380.