User blog comment:El Alamein/Count Roland vs. Harold Godwinson/@comment-11361577-20160121120241

Appelmonkey's "True King of England" Edge's

Durendal vs. Longsword: Normaly I would give the edge to someone with a magic sword, but since this is the real world and not mythology, divine properties mean fucking nothing. Anyway, both swords have the same stats, other then the longsword having a curved crossbar, wich is beter I guess. So edge gos to Harold. Edge: Harold Godwinson

Angon vs. Dane Axe: Welp the angon has longer range and can be used faster, but when you throw it, it's gone and while it can bend there is also a chance of breaking. The axe on the other hand is heavier and has less range, but it's also more durible and deals more damage. So, when I have to compair the pros and cons I gotta give it to the axe for it's greater duribility. Edge: Harold Godwinson

Fransisca vs. Hunting Bow: This obviously gos to the bow. Sure, the fransisca can be used as a melee weapons, but as a longrange weapon it sucks in comparison against the longer range and greater acuracy of the hunting bow. Edge: Harold Godwinson

Hauberk vs. Byrnie: The armors are basicly the same, but the hauberk covers more then the byrnie. So, obviously the hauberk gets the edge. Edge: Count Ronald

X-Factors: Both warriors have an even amount of X-Factors, so it's even. Edge: Tie

Deadliest Warrior: Harold Godwinson. I am gonna make like a reverse hipster and go with the main stream. Sure, Ronald has beter armor, training and disciplen, but he just fails in all of the weapons and lacks the expiriance and the tactics of Harold.