User blog comment:Urbancommando77/Mongols VS Saxons/@comment-4476906-20140410221708

Urban EDGES

Close: The Turko-Mongol saber could make some fine Mongolian BBQ, but you have to remember that the Saxons wear Chainmail, which is slash resistant. Also, the Saxon Longsword is greater in length. The Turko-Mongol Saber wouldn't be able to stand up against the Armor of a Saxon, while the Longsword will have a fine time with the Lamellar.

EDGE: Saxons

Mid: Being stuck by the Boar Spear sounds about as pleasant as slowly bleeding out while someone poor salt into the wound, but the Glaive is even MORE savage. The blade is longer, has a hook, and is meant for combat, not sticking wild boars.

EDGE: Mongols

Long: While using a Crossbow requires less effort than a Recurve Bow, which requires 100-Pound forced drawback, the Recurve Bow can literally go through an elephants skin. Which is awesome. The recurve bow is even more excellent on Horseback, which is why the Mongols are made up of archers on horseback.

EDGE: Mongol

Special: A Dane Axe has a better chance at braining an enemy, at more of a distance, than the flanged mace. But the flanged mace can strike quicker and leaves more room for maneuvering.

EDGE: Even

Armor: Lamallar may be leather stacked upon leather, but most of the Mongol's weapons will have one hell of a time getting through a Saxon's Chainmail. If they DO get throught the Chainmail, then their is some leather to hold the strike back.

EDGE: Saxon

Winner: The Mongols have horses, but good luck maneuvering in a frickin' forest. The Saxons have better armor and close range, which go together like burgers and fries. The Saxons will win this in my opinion, but just barely. Better luck next time, Mongols.