User blog comment:Tomahawk23/Wolverine Vs. Alex Mercer/@comment-76.201.90.134-20121228180111/@comment-4098900-20121228183753

First off, Mercer can't harm Wolverine at a range either. His whipfist won't do anything. Guns and throwing cars at him won't do much either. Secondly, Mercer CANNOT run at 210 mph. Consuming Wolverine won't do anything. People have tried it before. The bones can't be consumed. He'll be back in fighting condition within minutes. Wolverine is smarter then a master scientist and a far greater tactician. Unless this was an infected zone Mercer wouldn't even be able to consume him. If it was an infected zone, as I already explained, it still wouldn't work. Mercer's durabilty won't matter because of Wolverine's adamantium claws, they'll go right through him. So then all you can really account for is his healing factor. Last but not least, Wolverine is A LOT without his adamantium skeleton. He just wouldn't be able to go toe to toe with much stronger warriors such as the Hulk (not that he ever did or will beat the Hulk). All you're giving are advantages Mercer has, you aren't saying how he can kill Wolverine. Well, you are, but you're reasons are completely untrue. Sorry, but this vote doesn't count. Can somebody please give a GOOD argument for Mercer? There's plenty of them.