User blog comment:El Alamein/Cfp3157's Army vs. RSV 123's Army/@comment-5232784-20120816032646

Okay, Lets compare forces:

1. I think the Roman Legions are better equipped than the Normans, though they did not have the powerful Knights that the Norman had. I go with RSV here

2. spartan Hoplites where bad news, but the Wallachian Infantry have steel weapons. Cfp wins here

3. Rajputs will trounce the German infantry. No contest. RSV wins again

4. Crusader Knights were medieval war tanks, but Landsknechts were gun toting cavalry-killing fiends, their pikes and haldberds giving them more than a considerable advantage over knights. Cfp wins

5. The Hunnic Horsemen have a longer range "short range" weapon (sword) than the Mongols (Mace) and a projectile for a spear (the Mongol Jida Lance a charging weapon. There was a reason why soliferums where considered better than the Jida Lance in the Hannibal vs Ghengis Khan episode). However, the Huns have leather armor, while the Mongols have steel, ad Ghengis Khan, perhaps the greatest military mastermind of his age, if not of all time, will be a better cammander than Atila the Hun. Edge Cfp

6. The scythed Persian Chariot will demolish the wheels of the celtic chariot as it did in the Celt vs Persian Immortal episode of DW. Edge RSV

7. In the battle of Raphia, Asian and North African War elephants met on the battlefield: Though a few North African elephants stood their ground, many fled from the larger, more imposing Indian Elephants, who greater size, better armor and weapons won them the clash (though the Seleucids who commanded them lost the battle as a whole). And with guns in play,and Carthaginian elephants not used to loud cannon shot, they will panic and retreat. Hannibal's tactical genius will not be able to overcome this. Due to larger Asian elephants, better armor and weaponry, and cannons, the Edge: RSV

Overall, I vote RSV as the Winner