User blog comment:Appelmonkey/Rematch: Chrom vs. King Arthur/@comment-35680048-20190412234721

Tybaltcapulet's " Super Royalty Smash Enemies Brawl" Edges"

Swords: Honestly, this to me is an easy edge to Excalibur. Falchion isn't a horrible sword with its repair and healing ability, which can keep Excalibur at bay for a while, but really suffers in the long run. The healing ability of Falchion is rather limited, only really dealing with minor injuries, and must be activated by the user manually.The blinding effect of the scabbard will throw Chrom off his games, and its blood ability may sound simple, but instead of having to heal damage manually, it prevents real damage from even happening. Also, Excalibur is a beast in power compared to Falchion.Edge: King Arthur 

Lances: As cool as ripping through 9 men is Rhongomyniad  loses out to Gáe Bolg. Gáe Bolg's defensive ability will be very useful to Chrom, especially with a beast like Excalibur going against him. And against Rhon,  Gáe Bolg is nearly as far behind in raw power. Yes the poison could screw over Chrom, but with armor, that's pretty unlikely. And Falchion can always alleviate a little bit of that so it isn't as bad, so Rhon just loses here because it lacks the utility of Gáe Bolg and the power to consistently damage Chrom.Edge: Chrom

Special: A normal spear vs a neva-miss knife? Carnwennan never, never misses its target, meaning that as soon as Arthur uses it, Carnwennan will strike Chrom. The spear, is just that, a spear. No magical properties or anything and relies on Chrom being accurate enough to where Arthur can't just block it. And to me, that's not realy plausible, as Arthur physically is a formidable warrior and isn't just standing there waiting for an attack. Also if Carnwennan strikes anywhere unprotected on Chrom, he's kinda screwed.Edge: King Arthur 

Armor: Laqy already summed it up pretty well. Both of these pieces of armor have their own advantages and really balance out here. Arthur's armor sacrifices coverage for the unbreaking durability of his torso armor, making all of Chrom's weapons useless against it. Chrom doesn't have the durability of Arthur's torso armor, but overall is covered more fully. As for shields, they too aren't terribly different from each other making this category a wash.Edge: Even

X-factors/Overall: I'm ruling in favor of King Arthur as well. Any real advantages that Chrom has are easily countered by Arthur. Plate armor that covers more of your body? Well Excalibur's right there to smash it with its mighty swing. Agility and unorthodox movements? Well not only is Arthur fast enough to counter this, even if he wasn't, his durability would be able to resist some devastating hits. And let's address the elephant in the room. Arthur has way more experience against a larger variety of foes. Arthur has been fighting at least twice as long as Chrom has been alive, let alone actually fighting. King Arthur simply outclasses Chrom as a warrior, who will be overtaken by his much greater experience, speed, and yes Excalibur which like Laqy I believe to be the ultimate deciding weapon here.