User blog comment:El Alamein/Sargon of Akkad vs. Ashurbanipal/@comment-24461549-20140425091418

Sir William Of Chalitton's "I went there!"

Close Range : This is like you pitted a PDW with an M4 Carbine. The sword is shorter than the dagger but it is greater in material and more comfortable to use. Well I am quite surprised the sword is shorter than the dagger. EDGE : Ashurbanipal

Medium Range : Although Ashurbanipal's spear was heavier, it has only a difference of 0,5 lbs, the material of Ashurbanipal's spear can overkill Sargon's men. EDGE : Ashurbanipal

Long Range : The Composite Bow is just an improvement over Sargon's ordinary bow and arrow. Plus the material used is superior for the Composite bow. The arrow ? Well I still gonna say it's no brainer. Longer range and better material, no doubt and no brainer. EDGE : Ashurbanipal

Special : Although the Sling is better in range, it is too weak. The sling always lost an edge in Deadliest Warrior except Jaguar's Tematatl or any name for that. Well the Javelin did do a great job on destroying enemy lines and annoying them. Plus it has greater power. EDGE : Sargon Of Akkad

X Factors : I'd get this to Ashurbanipal. He is brutal. He can kick off Sargon easily.

Winner : Ashurbanipal

Did you just say this is a battle of Bronze age tyrants ? No. I would not said that. Ashurbanipal used Iron weapons. Bronze vs Iron, Iron wins. Well Ashurbanipal is also more brutal, so he can punish Sargon to the battlefield and do what he can do as brutal as he can for psychological warfare.

My vote is that !