User blog comment:Manofgod/King David vs Count Roland (Battle of the Holy Warriors!)/@comment-4661256-20170510074143/@comment-3977304-20170510122643

I don't care about your battle sir but you can link it to me if you want.

But to answer your question, I did my best to make this blog fair and balanced. Roland has a long technological gap than David but he was living in the Dark Ages where materials and metals were scarce. King David only had bronze and iron weapons but he was smarter and defeated more foes.

Metallurgy or techonology is not as important as tactics and strategy in winning a war. If it so then we could agree that the Arminius didn't defeat Rome at Teutoberg, America lost the revolution, and Germany's superior arms won them WWII.

Please read the weapons and x-factors if you want to see how fair it is, and if you want you can write a vote for Count Roland.