User blog comment:Sport Shouting/William Wallace vs Sun Tzu/@comment-422690-20111009032740

Close: Warhammer wins. Steel plate crushing powerhouse with a good reach vs a simple dagger? I know what I'm going with. Edge: William Wallace

Mid 1: Claymore wins. Longer reach and more power. Edge: William Wallace.

Mid 2: Axe wins. The Ball and Chain is highly inaccurate. Edge: Sun Tzu,

Long Range: Shortbow wins. As we've seen on the show, the incendiary arrows aren't a good weapon for killing a target. It requires a trap, and traps can be avoided. (Note: I WILL curse out anyone who says "but Sun Tzu can find a way to lure him in" or the like) Edge: William Wallace.

Special: Targe and Dirk win. The Repeating Crossbow won't get past the shield. Edge: William Wallace.

X-Factors:William Wallace wins, with an average of 86.5 over Sun Tzu's average of 79.8333..., which is a 7.1666... point advantage. Edge: William Wallace.

Overall: William Wallace wins. Sun Tzu cannot and will not win a fight against another warrior on this wiki. He's not good at actual combat, and he isn't the perfect general everyone seems to think he is. Plus, William Wallace has the better weapons and an edge in X-Factors.