User blog comment:Goddess of Despair/Apache vs Zande Warrior/@comment-5931345-20130815074516

Short: Though the war club is a devastating blunt weapon. In a battle between unarmored warriors, the Makraka has the advantage of being a bladed weapon, offering moredamage and killing potential. Edge: Zande

Mid: At first look I was going o give i to the Makrigga becasue it has the longer reach, but then the tomahawk has the advatage of a throwable weapon. But after some thinking, I think the makrigga's reach may also be a disadvantage because if the Apache ever closes he gap between him and the sharp tip, then the Zande is toast. Especially tha the Apache is good in closing gaps (e.g. fighing soldiers armed with flintlock byonet rifles). The tomahawk itself is offers blunt and bladed damage. Edge: Apache

Long: I have to go with the Apache bow. THose things can go through a Bison's hide and kill it. The Apache's are excellent bowmen, especially in horseback. Edge: Apache

Special: I have o go with the kpinga on this one. It offers the bigger damage, and has the longer reach that'll keep an Apache with knife at bay. It can also be thrown. Go figure. Edge: Zande

Winner: After some thinking, I'll have to go with the Apache. They have far better tactics. As their hit and run tactics would devastate the Zande's more psychological approach. Alhough the Zande was far more successful in their campaigns, the Apache has the slightly better weapons. Especially the better range weapons. In a straight up fight the Zande may have a slight edge, but if the Apache can attack first and draw first blood, the Zande is toast.