User blog comment:Elgb333/Jason Bourne vs Daniel Lamb/@comment-5931345-20140606040514

I'm not even going on the weapons cuz Lamb obviously won this category in a landslide.

I'm also sorry that I'm going to give this battle another tie, and that's because only a few of you even know Manhunt 2. Daniel Lamb, for me, is the winner. Now, we can all argue that these two are government agents; highly trained nd experienced. Bourne obviously would kill Lamb in cqc. For those who played Manhunt 2, the melee gameplay of Lamb is horrendous, and its suicide to fight more than two grunts at the same time. So saying Lamb has great cqc skills is stupidity.That's why Lamb uses stealth. Bourne maybe highly trained and experienced, but the majority of those were washed away or lost due to his amnesia. Lamb got his training and experience from being implanted with the pickman project, which takes only less time butgives him almost limitless knowledge of killing. But for thosewho played the game, we all know Lamb isn't really the killer behind all of this but its his split personality Leo, who may or may not existed historically. There's also his stealth. The guy's practically a ninja, he can hide in the shadows even if wearing brigt clothing. And this is the reason why Lamb wins this. Bourne may have the knowledge to combat this kind of stealth involving darkness (like in The Bourne Objective), but Lamb's stealth is all about hbecoming invisible using the darkness. He can effortlessly hide and evade with no detection. This type of stealth is what kicked Bourne's ass during his first battle with Leonil Arkadin. And unlike Arkadin, Lamb has a million tricks involving the darkness. If Bourne does get the upperhand, Lamb can take refuge in the shadows.

Another thing that gives Lamb the edge is his monster physicality. He's stronger and faster that Bourne. The guy can basically rip a guy in two vertically using a katana, and can outrun virtually everyone in the game and stalk just as fast. SO YEAH BITE ME, LAMB BUTCHERS JASON BOURNE