User blog comment:Deathblade 100/Australia vs Nepal: Gurkhas vs Rats of Tobruk/@comment-5043545-20150202212413

WanderingSkull's GraveDigging Tunes "The Exterminators" 

Melee: The Kukri is one of my favorite weapons for close range combat and the bayonet is awesome, but none of the Rats' weapons can mount a bayonet. So, simply put the effectiveness of the bayonet is depleted in comparison once you remove that as a choice. EDGE: Gurkhas

SMGs: The Sten has the superior rate of fire, but it still pales in comparison to the Thompson. The Sten's design is less practical for combat and has the weaker round. The Thompson offers superior power and design for the user to engage in combat. Simply put, the Sten is outclassed. EDGE: Rats Of Tobruk

LMGs: The Bren can jam as we've seen based on demonstrations so that's a disadvantage from the beginning. The Lewis Gun isn't prone to jamming and the sighting system is much more comfortable on it for the user. Still, what messes it up bad is the way you have to reload ruining its advantages and chances to score kills due to defects. EDGE: Gurkhas

Tactics: The Siege Of Tobruk is much better as a prime example of Rats Of Tobruk tactical capacity. The Gurkhas were part of a much larger force in the case of their battle. The Siege had severely slowed down Rommel's advance and proved invaluable due to the pure amount of time, I mean 240 days isn't exactly anything to laugh at. MAJOR EDGE: Rats Of Tobruk

Deadliest Warrior: Gurkhas- I wanted to give this to the Rats, but their harder-hitting SMG and better tactics ain't going to cut it. The Gurkhas were more dedicated and their endurance allows them to fight off in longer engagements. The Rats have proven themselves worth adversaries, but will be defeated by the much better trained and ferocious Gurkhas.