User blog comment:Weew1213/The Man with no Name vs Rooster Cogburn (1969) "Gunslingers in 60's"/@comment-4661256-20160302174841

El Alamein's Edges:

 Melee: Bowie Knife vs. Bowie Knife:  As I'm not familiar with either warrior I'll just have to take Elgb's word for it that the Man with No Name is a more skilled bladed-weapons user.

Edge: The Man with No Name

 Close Range: Single Action Army vs. Peacemaker:  They're the same weapon... so, um. Rooster Cogburn gets the edge for having two pistols as opposed to the Man with No Name's one pistol--Cogburn has twice as much ammo as his opponent. That's... that's pretty much it, considering the stats are identical (since they're the same gun).

Edge: Rooster Cogburn

 Mid Range; Double-Barrel Shotgun vs. Coach Gun:  Again, these weapons are pretty damn near identical. I guess Elgb has a point but this difference is rather marginal when both weapons have the same range, feed system and magazine capacity.

Edge: Even

 Long Range: Henry/Sharps Combo vs. Winchester Rifle:  This is rather unfair, giving the Man with No Name two long-ranged weapons to Cogburn's one, considering that gives the Man with No Name an ammunition advantage right off the bat. Not only that but the Man with No Name outranges Cogburn considerably with the Sharps, meaning he can fire on his opponent before risking return fire in response.

Edge: The Man with No Name

WINNER: THE MAN WITH NO NAME

From what I can gather, the Man with No Name is more accurate and skilled with his weapons, but he's also got a huge advantage at long range since he has two rifles. So, I guess that's what gives him the victory.

On a side note Weew, I think it would help out a lot if the stats you provide for the weapons are more detailed, and if you try to emphasize the differences between the weapons to help the voter determine a signficant edge. For instance, I have no idea how the Colt Single-Action Army is customized (my only guess is cosmetics based on the image, but that's it). I'm not trying to attack you or make fun of you, I'm just trying to give some constructive criticism is all. This battle is certainly interesting between two dynamic characters, and you deserve more votes for that, but I think your formatting might be turning some people away.