User blog comment:Swg66/Army vs Army: East vs West/@comment-82.35.200.15-20110427164345

This is a toughie, but i'm gonna go for the west, because as good as the east's fighters are, they would only be good on a one-to-one basis, while the west would have tougher armour, tougher shields (that aren't made of wicker) and english longbows (which were effective against the french). Plus, the west will have roman tactics (divide et impera) and phalanx formations, so that would halt any charges from cavalry. I better stop before this becomes more of an essay... :)