User blog comment:Sport Shouting/William Wallace vs Sun Tzu/@comment-3189283-20111008214239

Let's see shall we.

Close range: The War hammer is far stronger and more powerful. Edge William Wallace

Mid range: The ball and chain sucks but the claymore easily outclasses the axe and jian and will quite easily prentatrate tzu's armour. Edge Willam Wallace

Long range: Flamming arrows are really only effective when used in conjuction with oil and dry grass. The Ettrick shortbow has no such problems. Edge Willam Wallace.

Special weapon: While the crossbow does have the longer range it only just gets the edge. The targe and dirk are a great combo and i'm not quite sure if the bolts can get through wallace's armour. Edge Sun Tzu

Armour: Wallace's armour is way ahead of sun tzu's time meaning it is the superior armour. Edge Willam Wallace.

I don't care how great of an tactition he was sun tzu is not a fighter. He was just a general where as wallace actually fought in battles. William Wallaces weapons and armour are far more advanced and his huge size and feroicosness make him a formidable foe. He gets the edge in weapons and x factors as sun tzu only has intuiton.

William Wallace: 3,500

Sun Tzu: 1,500