User blog comment:El Alamein/Landsknecht vs. Samurai/@comment-4098900-20120730013752

I vote Landsknecht. For one their armor, Landsknecht armor is stronger and provides more mobility. Another thing is guns. Samurai's aren't great with guns, it is part of why they were driven out. They couldn't really adapt to them. On the other hand the Landsknecht were much more accurate with guns and could use them more effectivily. With a battle between two warriors where they both have guns, one is accurate with them and the other ain't guns will be a big factor. The Landsknecht's guns will probably get the majority of kills in this match. Landsknechts took out KNIGHTS for christ shakes KNIGHTS. Knights are one of the few warriors acient warriors who could actually defeat a Samurai. Landsknecht outdated the Samurai. They are better trained and more skilled overall. Landsknecht overall were in combat moe often then Samurai too. Samurai's weren't always at war. Lanksknecht were always being hired by some goverment or something. There was always some country in Europe who was at war, there was never a year in middleaged Europe where several countries in Europe weren't at war. All of these countries wanted the Landsknecht, they were at war everyfuc*#king day. Every week several of these guys killed someone. That means the members will probably be more experienced then the Samurai opponent he is facing. Of course, the Samurai as whole have more experience, they've been fighting since the 1200s. Still though, won't make much difference. Landsknechts are really just a advanced version of a Samurai. With better weapons, armor, training, average operator experience all of that stuff. That is why the Landsknecht will take this fight.