User blog comment:El Alamein/North Korean Army vs. North Vietnamese Army/@comment-5338740-20120709044338

THE DOCTOR'S DIAGNOSIS OF DEATH AND CARNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!


 * Short-NKA. Both of these guns are essentially firing 7.63x25mm rounds, making them even in cartridges. The Mauser brings in far superior range, 150m (C96) vs. 50m (T54), giving it a major edge in combat. The Mauser also has a slightly larger magazine size, 10 rounds to 8. The Mauser also has a better Muzzle Velocity. When all these factors add up, the classic mauser is a far superior gun.


 *  Mid-Even. I like both of these SMGs, and it will be hard to choose. Both of these guns also fire 7.63x25mm rounds, so even. Rate of Fire is also even, 900 rounds per minute. Too make it fair, I'd say the PPSh should have a box magazine in the fight instead of the classic 75-round drum magazine. With a box magazine, both these guns are even with 35 rounds per mag. Overall, the guns are even.


 * LMG-NVA. I couldn't find much information on the DP, but the RPD appears to have greater range, clip, and rate of fire according to Arrow.


 * Semi-Auto Rifles-Even. Both of these guns have slightly different cartridge sizes, with the SVT-40 being the greater of the two. 7.62x54mm to the SKS' 7.62x39mm rounds. Another thing the SVT has the edge in would have to be range (only with a scope). With a scope, it's 800 metres to the SKS' 500m. But without a scope they are even. Both have the same magazine size. Aside from the slight cartridge difference, I'd say these two are even.

I will finish my vote if you remind me in chat tomorrow, EA.