User blog comment:HaydenStudios/Quote vs. Duke Nukem/@comment-4484220-20120422183818

Oh, hey guys. Sorry to revive such an old battle, but since my voting policy involved counting the vote in full provided that it simply provides one reason, some votes were counted in full that really, really shouldn't have been. So I'm going to do a vote recount with thi new voting policy:

Votes with good and strong reasons with mention of both warriors = 1

Votes that aren't really full = 1/2

Really really bad votes that have so little effort put into them, or simply say things that aren't true = 0

Copy votes count for nothing as it's just like only stating the name of the warrior.

So, let's see who won here:

Wassboss and Pacheco provided some pretty good and strong reasons, so that's two votes for Quote. Urbancommando made a relatively lengthy vote, but really just mentioned Duke, and said nothing about Quote at all, so that counts as a half vote for Duke. Omnicube's vote for Quote really didn't provide that much, and even acted like Quote had magical weapons in this battle, so I'm not going to count that vote at all. So right now its:

Quote: 2

Duke: 1/2

That anon below Omni didn't do a whole lot. But later on he made a slight embellishment which, merged with his original vote, passes as a half vote for Quote. Tomahawk's vote for Quote didn't really say much, so it counts for nothing. Drayco's vote for Duke is obviously a full one, and Las' copy does nothing. In the end, five people voted for Quote, while three voted for Duke. With applying the voting count system:

Quote: 2 1/2

Duke: 1 1/2

Quote is still the deadlier warrior, so my battle still stands as it is, I just wanted to clarify that even with a proper vote system, Quote is still the deadlier warrior. And in terms of actual ability and arsenal, by a landslide in my opinion. I kinda feel guilty giving Duke an opponent like this.

But anyway,

WINNER: QUOTE