User blog comment:El Alamein/Lewis and Clark vs. Paul Revere/@comment-5495321-20120925222636

this is atough one for me.

Long range: both of these rifles are extremely accurate. But for me, it's going to go with the more modern technology. So with that being said, lewis and clark take long range.

Mid range: The brown bess is sort of a piece of crap, but it served it's purpose well and got the job done. Now when comparing that to the Springfield, it's again very close. But again I've got to hand it to the more modern technology. Edge: Lewis and Clark.

Now when the fight gets down and dirty, Paul is going to be more prepared. He's bringing superior swords to the knves and axes of L and C. So in close quarters, Revere has greater reach, and more power. An axe is great, but since it's a woodcutting axe, it is very clumsy. Edge: Paul Revere.

Finally, for special weapons, the pipe tomahawk is a badass weapon for killing or for getting stoned, but it doesn't really compare to the very awesome cannon. My edge goes with paul Revere and the 6-pound cannon.

Deadliest warrior? Paul Revere is going to have to take this fight right out of Lewis and Clark's reach. Why, he's going to be used to fighting in small militia groups, an he'll be used to fighting all around. Lewis and Clark did fight, but their experience with it is almost none. So who is the deadliest warrior? Paul Revere.