User blog comment:Arrow7000/Batman (Terry McGinnis) vs. Iron man (MCU)/@comment-5790624-20120716183626

It's not a potato so it counts right?:)

More to the point, having only just realised this battle is sitting on the site, I feel even I want to vote, even if it's from my phone.

Weaponary/Equipment/Tools:

Batarang vs. Repulsor Beam: 

Well.. I think there is a very good reason why this comes to be Stark's weapon of choice on the suit. The Repulsor beam is notabley effective in dealing significant power against Thor during their forest fight. The power these beams have the fact they can be fired just as quickly as Batman can get out a batarang means Tony is at an advanatge. The sheer power the Repulsor beam utilises means splash damage may throw Batman or stagger him, renduring a weakness Stark can exploit. The Batarag's may be able to cut metal but I doubt it will deal enough damage to be able serverley affect the suit. Stark's suit can endure Thor's thunder, it can endure an electric batarang. And for the explosive batarang, Stark's armor is far to endurable and reinforced to be affected by damage of such a type as far as I see it.

Edge: Ironman

Explosives, Gasses and Bolas vs. Wrist mounted rockets:

This is tough. Both suits bring these unique kind of weapons. These rockets on Stark's suit are armor peircing meaning they will a serious affect if a direct hit is landed but armor peicing rounds lack splash damage and Batman is enhanced with extreme munouverability. On the otherhand Batman has access to various equipment, I think the flashbangs may have a split-second affect on Stark but nothing fatal, the grenades are the only lethality hear and probably have a resembalence to the explosive batarangs. Rate of fire as it may is notable here. Stark can quickly access his rockets and fire them one after another, however Batman may have to ponder him time activitating his grenades, this is only notable tie braker I can utilise and thus gains Stark the edge in my opinion.

Edge: Ironman

Cloaking, surface adhesion, electrical discharges and enhanced vision vs. "Turn and Burn Laser" and Unibeam:

To keep this as short as possible since I am on the tedious technology of my phone. I'm wrapping up the weapons in one go. Stark's suit bring a asorted variety of weaponary. The Unibeam and 'Turn and Burn' laser have their reputations for lethality. However Batman brings the unique power of cloaking which means Ironman won't be able to kill what he can't see, electrical discharges, but these may have little affect since the suit can withstand Thor's thunder and enhanced vision. Now, for the enhanced vision section, it's notable that both various have unique vision abilities, Ironman is capable of locking on to various targets as notable at 00:25 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o2ACEr9NmQ, however, Batman is given enchanced vision capability which will go hand in hand with cloaking and his stealth and versatility to make him a unseen danger. I know these are just more weapons for Stark sometimes it isn't just about weapons but other unique powers and abilities which contribute which means Batman has this one for me.

Edge: Batman

 Overall: 

Overall, I'm giving this to Ironman but just barley. Ironman has some exotic weaponary that not even Batman will be prepared for. Batman is equiped more toward criminals, weird alien things, etc, Ironman is more equiped toward suits. I know Batman has some good kit like cloaking devices but his offensive weapons are just a little bit off against Stark's armor and I think Stark will be able to exploit this.

Deadliest Warrior: Ironman

P.S. - Sorry this is late:).