User blog comment:Mo2damo/Rorschach vs Batman/@comment-143604-20120712010644

Drayco90's Edgy Edges of Edg-AMURICA!!!


 * Close Range- Batman. Rorschach's hand-to-hand style is far more brutal than Batman's and involves a lot more breaking and handicapping, but it's also more wild and less disciplined, allowing Batman to take advantage of an opening easier. Rorschach also has honed his craft to be specific to fighting multiple enemies at once, as opposed to solo combat- he's more used to taking down numerous foes, but Batman's style is flexible enough that he doesn't have any issues in single combat. The craptastic Nolanverse Batsuit will restrict his movement some, but not enough to give Rorschach an edge.


 * Mid-Range- Rorschach. Neither weapon will have much effect on the other, but the nonlethal bombs are not in fact, a flamethrower.


 * Long Range- Rorschach. The Batarangs aren't incredibly effective weapons, being bat-shaped shuriken more or less. Rorschach's Grapple Gun will allow him superior mobility to move around the environment as well as doing some serious damage if Rorschach decides to use it as a weapon.


 * Deadliest Warrior- Rorschach. Nolan-Batman is probably the weakest Batman in the history of the charcter (that, or he's tied with Adam West's version of the character.), he's not nearly as smart, mobile, armed or experienced as most other versions, and his batsuit simply isn't that great. He's got Rorschach beat in hand-to-hand, but Rorschcach's brutality, willingness to kill and better overall arsenal, combined with the masked madman's superior use of his environment to fight his foes, and this will be a narrow victory for the guy with the Napoleon complex.