User blog comment:3shady/Viet Cong VS Afghan Mujahideen/@comment-26150944-20141008222138

TheWetWaffle's "Rebellion" Edges

Short Range: While I am a sucker for bayonets, the Spike Bayonet is not a very versatile weapon since it mainly needs the user to thrust with it to be useful. The Pulwar is way more versitile, is longer, and more intimidating. But it needs to be switched out and in close combat scenerios you may not have time. Speed vs. power... even.

Edge: Even

Mid Range: These two weapons are so similar it disgusts me. The Type-56 is probably the best non-Soviet AK clone out there but has the downside of being a clone. Why is being a clone not very good? The weapon is lower quality and isn't as reliable as the real thing. The AKM is the superior weapon since it's basically the AK-47 but with some adjustments, bringing the same reliabilty of it's predecessor without the faults of a clone.

Edge: Mujahideen

Long Range: I love the Lee-Enfield with all my heart. It was probably the best rifle of WWII, with it's 10 round capacity and smooth bolt action. Even the Afghan people who did own guns trained with the Lee-Enfield but in recent years precision has fallen to automatic weapons like the AK. But I digress, as these Lee-Enfield clones are very dangerous to handle. As I said in the previous comparion, clones break. A lot. The Mosin is a lot safer to use since it won't break when the Viet Cong member using it pulls the trigger.

Edge: Viet Cong

TBF