User blog comment:Elgb333/Western All-Stars Battle: Lone Ranger vs Man with No Name/@comment-26032472-20160603155713/@comment-112.198.64.60-20160604055001

Leolab is right. Lead is softer and more malleable than lead. While it's also true that the lead's ability to deform and fragment creates nastier wounds, it also makes them less accurate and straight in its flight path. Hence why there was a need to coat them with full metal jackets, especially when high velcity smokeless gunpowder came around. Silver bullets can be fired farther and more accurate, and they can penetrate deeper than lead.

And Alockwood, it doesn't mean that the Lone Ranger doesn't kill means he's already less deadly. You have to know that the Ranger has also tangled with deadly gunslingers before, and like Clint Eastwood, he can also shoot multiple people at once. The only difference is that he can disarm them all with one draw, which is more difficult than killing and just shows how the Lone Ranger is more talented than the Man with No Name.