User blog comment:Kazanshin/Special Assault Team vs Snow Leopard Commando Unit/@comment-36053634-20180923234132

Guitarcar's "Asian skirmish" edges

Pistols: The 2 pistols are literally identical aside from the mags and caliber. A pistol should not be used as a primary and should be a secondary instead. 20 round mags are handy but would you really rush in with the pistol armed instead of a rifle. I'll give it to USP for holding a better stopping rate. Besides, why do you need that much ammo (20). Would you really miss that bad?

Slight edge: SAT

SMG:

I'll follow with everybody's opinion here. The faster ROF the bull up packs will easily outbeat and out do the MP5. One note: Bull-ups look ugly.

Edge: SLCU

AR:

The opinion war below makes me want to vote the QBZ-95. A ruined city either isnt really friendly for rifles that are long as you would constantly need to watch out for the barrel. Like what a few US veterans told me in an M4 vs M16 Debate. "A shorter barrel makes all the diffrence in house clearing".

Edge: SLCU

Snipey-snipe:

Guy's sniper battles dont last long nor do they need a huge ammount of ammo to be better thus making the QBU's only advantage redundant. The more accurate and powerful sniper with a long range will defenitely beat the Chinese sniper rifle.

Major edge: SAT

Martial-arts:

NO NO AND HELL NAWH!!! I dont like martial art debates nor do I think there effective with guns everywhere.

Edge: Both are redundant in the scenario given.

X-Factors: (I think I can agree with the last one. China has by far created lots of tensions with its neighbours after it made navy bases on the west Phillipine sea.  The Anti-Chinese sentiments here!!!)

The SAT as you said has better training because they work with their Western counterparts. There longer experience in hostage rescue and Counter-terrorism will also prevail much better against the fresher Chinese elites.

Major Edge: SAT

TBC