User blog comment:Wassboss/The Deadliest Warrior Rematch Hub/@comment-39845974-20200108034332

Viking vs Samurai.

I felt that the Original battle was itself highly inaccurate in portraying both of these warriors. For one, these were Vague in the description of the 2 warriors sets of warriors and used inathentic representations of said equipment. A big example of this is not saying which type of Samurai armor they used, labeling it as leather and steel in their description. Another example is how they have the vikings an infanty spear as their primary ranged weapon, even though the spear they depicted was designed for melee combat and was not a throwing weapon. They also didn't show the 2 warriors fighting in the way they would have fought. Vikings fought in tight shield formations and Samurai were mainly light cavalry.

This battle would be a 10 on 10 confrontation instead of a 1 on 1. This allows these 2 groups to fight effectively, considering the fact that they didn't fight as single enemies and were primarily adapted for group combat.