User blog comment:Alockwood1/Sir Daniel Fortesque Versus Samurai Jack/@comment-184.45.54.235-20150724122526/@comment-17814994-20150725005133

I think what BattleGames was trying to imply is that the sword's powers only becomes nullified if it was in the hands of someone evil. I've seen Jack still use on against even good-hearted people such as the Scotsman, the Female Assassin, and that Hitman Robot (which is neutral), and the sword defeated them each. Sir Daniel is far worse than what was mentioned, and he's certainly "innocent". I mean come on, Sir Daniel Fortesque I've seen that guy do assholish and devious things. So I'm pretty sure that the sword can defeat him like it always do.