User blog comment:So-Pro Warrior/Lawrence of Arabia vs. Charles W. Whittlesey/@comment-27749261-20160325222033

ILoveBattles "Slashy shoot shoot" Edges

Melee: I can see that the Jambiya is completly outmatched here because the bayonet can be added to the front of a gun, as well as being a reliable knife as well. Also the length is completly different since most bayinets were almost swords back then.

EDGE: BAYONET

Short: Normally, I would choose the M1911, but seeing that there is only a 1 round difference along with the power of the revolver completly destroying the M1911 easily. The range is exactly the same, so no fault there, yeah. I don't see the M1911 winning out here.

EDGE: WEBLEY

Long: Let's see. Accuracy, same. Rate of Fire? Same. Muzzle velocity? Same. Clip size? Aaaahhh. There you go. So, as you can clearly see, they're pretty much the same weapons, but the Short Mag has a much larger clip, so you know that that is easy.

EDGE: ENFIELD SHORT MAG

Special: This is pretty much a battle of which gun jams less. But there is a problem that kight draw it closer. The Vickers has the much more powerful round. But the Browning jams less. I'm going to call it even because those two cancel out.

EDGE: EVEN

X-Factors: We already know Lawrence has a much higher average than Charles, so that gets the edge for him.

WINNER?!?!

This is a tough one, both are great warriors. Although I think the Battlefield Experience X-Factor should've been a much larger difference, I still gotta give this to Lawrence of Arabia for his Battlefield Experience and to some extent, better weaponry.

WINNER: LAWRENCE OF ARABIA