User blog comment:Omnicube1/Napoleon Bonaparte vs. George Washington/@comment-2016768-20110225011202/@comment-67.247.143.113-20110225012329

In a large scale conflict proably so, but in one on one washington has the advantage. The main advanatge of the advancing fire arms is they we're more accurate, which is handy when employing large numbers of new grunts. But with experience markmens, they can compenstate for the poor accuaracy through pure skill. Plus given that in a one on one fight, with muzzel loaders you only going to proably get one shot off before the fight goes into hand to hand, in which case Napoleon couldn't hope to Challange Washington.