User blog comment:Mikeylango/Game leads vs. Super heroes battle one: Master chief vs. Iron man (Movie rendition)/@comment-181289-20130503174453

While there are valid aspects to the Chief arguments, Iron Man would would in the end. His armor is overall far superior. The Ability of flight for example is far beyond any sort of flight system seen in the Halo, as far as what Chief has fought any way. I don't think Iron Man could/would kill the Chief, but he'd win in the end by rendering him unconscious, and I don't see Tony going as far as to kill Chief, he's not really a killer, even though he will if he has to, I don't think the fight would get to that. The repulsor blasts pack a punch, while I'm uncertain as to what kind of damage type they really qualify as, they manged to throw Loki across a room with enough force to leave and impact mark in the wall, and they even manged to affect Thor so some degree, given that they work on gods, even if the affects weren't really overly impressive, the repulors are going to have to have some affect on the Mjolnir Armor.

Another thing Stark has going for him in his ingenuity. He built a bunch of homemade weapons from things he found at a hardware store, what more they worked really well. Now non of those weapons world work on Master Chief but it does show how good Tony is at thinking and adapting to the situation.

The Special Weapon is the only weapon I think Chief has the advantage in, given how effective the energy sword is against armored opponent in the games. But for that to work, it means he'd have to get really close to use it, and with Iron Man flight and speed, that would be really hard to do. This fight would probably look pretty even it you were to watch it, but that is only because of the pure amount of damage both these two can take, the fight would be long only because it would take Iron Man a fairly long time to wear down Chief defense, but would in the end take the with about 85% to 95% of the time.