Board Thread:Warrior's Pub/@comment-4392864-20131111020347/@comment-5465602-20131113180245

Utter noob wrote: BeastMan14 wrote:

Utter noob wrote:

BeastMan14 wrote: I fail to understand how vaugeness contributes to why a battle shouldn't be rematched. Because just saying "Vampire Hunter" could apply to Abe Lincoln, Van Helsing, or Vampire Hunter Z. Zombie Hunter could apply to, well, anyone in the zombie hunters category. Vaugeness still isn't a reason to oppose a rematch. Just because Kev was unclear and inconsistent in who he was using for warriors, doesn't mean Alock will be as well. The vaugeness is a major issue. We have no freaking clue who Kev was using in that matchup as the warrior pages are inconsistant. Unless Kev steps forward and says which groups they are, they may as well just be his own user zombie hunters or user vampire hunters. If Alock wants to form teams like (Example, not a good matchup) Tank Dempsey and Chris Redfield vs Abe Lincoln and Buffy, and call it "Vampire Hunters vs Zombie Hunters" then that is a different matchup entirely.

Just because the warrior pages are inconsistent doesn't mean the warriors used in the fight are unknown. They are clearly meant to just be generic warriors for both factions, not any particular character. People are putting way too much thought into this.